• Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

What would you all do?

Status
Not open for further replies.
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
matter a fact I see members of CW who have done more trades than you and are highly respected members of CW posting in this thread.

Rich
[snapback]221979[/snapback]​
LMAO. "are highly respected members of CW"... Buwahahahahahahahaha! CigarWEAKLY. lol. If the moderators at CW refuse to give recourse to their members who have been cheated, robbed or otherwise ripped off then being a "respected" member there means you condone the moderators actions. Respect is not a word that the fellers who run Cweakly are familiar with. You don't strangle the people you respect with invasive and suffocating, punitive and arbitrary rules geared toward keeping your members muzzled. If you are a participating member of Cweakly then you are guilty too. Silence is acquiescence.

NA
[snapback]222086[/snapback]​

Just because someone is a respectable trader of at CW doesn't mean I condone what the moderators have done or the rules they hammer on there members.
I no more of a participating member of CW than you are.

I never implied consent or approval.

Rich
 
Neuromancer said:
Read page 2 of the thread...we didn't have to contact him...he joined just to be able to try and justify his weaseling position...and from what I understand from reading the thread, the CW moderators are well aware of what's going on and are doing nothing about it...
[snapback]222152[/snapback]​

I understand, and have followed the thread from the beginning. I'm just referring to an individual (who happens to be a moderator on CW), that is very reasonable and quite possibly could talk some sense into jacksi. If jacksi is isolated in the CW circle, then only someone in that organization can get in touch with him.
 
Shibumi said:
coventrycat86 said:
Interesting....

Is this just something they came up with?  What's the date of the thread?  I can't see it since they have not reinstated my account even though it's been more than 30 days........
[snapback]221925[/snapback]​

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:41 pm    Post subject: Protocol For Outing A Bad Trader..... by Renaissance Man

:rolleyes:
[snapback]221951[/snapback]​

Hey wiseguy, I CANNOT READ THE THREAD which is why I asked:
coventrycat86 said:
lucasbuck said:
KayakinBoy said:
LINK on CW?!?  I can't find it
[snapback]220183[/snapback]​

CW SALE POST
[snapback]220195[/snapback]​

I can't see it, I'm "suspended" :laugh:
[snapback]220439[/snapback]​
Take your rolling eyes and shove them back in your thick head. :angry:
 
I'd have to bet that he is not going to live up to what should be his responsibilty. It's sad when someone who has been involved in the community this long, makes a bad decision and becomes the "scumbag" of the moment.
 
coventrycat86 said:
Shibumi said:
coventrycat86 said:
Interesting....

Is this just something they came up with?  What's the date of the thread?  I can't see it since they have not reinstated my account even though it's been more than 30 days........
[snapback]221925[/snapback]​

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:41 pm    Post subject: Protocol For Outing A Bad Trader..... by Renaissance Man

:rolleyes:
[snapback]221951[/snapback]​

Hey wiseguy, I CANNOT READ THE THREAD which is why I asked:
coventrycat86 said:
lucasbuck said:
KayakinBoy said:
LINK on CW?!?  I can't find it
[snapback]220183[/snapback]​

CW SALE POST
[snapback]220195[/snapback]​

I can't see it, I'm "suspended" :laugh:
[snapback]220439[/snapback]​
Take your rolling eyes and shove them back in your thick head. :angry:
[snapback]222201[/snapback]​

That was the wrong smilie. I knew you coudn't see it and that was why I logged on there and posted it for you here. Sorry. :blush:
 
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
matter a fact I see members of CW who have done more trades than you and are highly respected members of CW posting in this thread.

Rich
[snapback]221979[/snapback]​
LMAO. "are highly respected members of CW"... Buwahahahahahahahaha! CigarWEAKLY. lol. If the moderators at CW refuse to give recourse to their members who have been cheated, robbed or otherwise ripped off then being a "respected" member there means you condone the moderators actions. Respect is not a word that the fellers who run Cweakly are familiar with. You don't strangle the people you respect with invasive and suffocating, punitive and arbitrary rules geared toward keeping your members muzzled. If you are a participating member of Cweakly then you are guilty too. Silence is acquiescence.

NA
[snapback]222086[/snapback]​

Just because someone is a respectable trader of at CW doesn't mean I condone what the moderators have done or the rules they hammer on there members.
I no more of a participating member of CW than you are.

I never implied consent or approval.

Rich
[snapback]222159[/snapback]​
Yes it does. I am a member of CW. After getting a load of the wrongheaded way the place is policed I refused to post there or interact there in any way. If you are a member there and you post there you are, in fact, condoning their behavior. You are consenting to be regulated by the rules there. Your participation is tacit agreement. No way around it.

NA
NA
 
LOL... Bill... me thinks that your account may never be reinstated...

And Matt... 100% agreed... One can only hope that he may try to make good someday...
 
Shibumi said:
That was the wrong smilie. I knew you coudn't see it and that was why I logged on there and posted it for you here. Sorry. :blush:
[snapback]222233[/snapback]​

:laugh: Most times it's not too hard to make me look dumb but I get cranky when someone makes me look silly when I thought I wasn't. If they'd just lift my "suspension" I'd be able to see the site but until then, I can't see it. All links direct me to the log in page and I still can't log in.

Aamzing how a site does its best to DISCOURAGE people from using it.......
 
nothing there worth reading.... kind of boring to me. Thats why I post here.
 
morenoloco said:
LOL... Bill... me thinks that your account may never be reinstated...

And Matt... 100% agreed... One can only hope that he may try to make good someday...
[snapback]222235[/snapback]​

Kinda too bad since I know some good people over there and have been a member in good standing for two years. I dunno what's up with those guys but they're really starting to make me wonder........

Maybe it's just me but can ANYONE see anything wrong with any of my posts over there? NONE were deleted or altered by the mods so all the evidence is out there to see.
 
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
matter a fact I see members of CW who have done more trades than you and are highly respected members of CW posting in this thread.

Rich
[snapback]221979[/snapback]​
LMAO. "are highly respected members of CW"... Buwahahahahahahahaha! CigarWEAKLY. lol. If the moderators at CW refuse to give recourse to their members who have been cheated, robbed or otherwise ripped off then being a "respected" member there means you condone the moderators actions. Respect is not a word that the fellers who run Cweakly are familiar with. You don't strangle the people you respect with invasive and suffocating, punitive and arbitrary rules geared toward keeping your members muzzled. If you are a participating member of Cweakly then you are guilty too. Silence is acquiescence.

NA
[snapback]222086[/snapback]​

Just because someone is a respectable trader of at CW doesn't mean I condone what the moderators have done or the rules they hammer on there members.
I no more of a participating member of CW than you are.

I never implied consent or approval.

Rich
[snapback]222159[/snapback]​
Yes it does. I am a member of CW. After getting a load of the wrongheaded way the place is policed I refused to post there or interact there in any way. If you are a member there and you post there you are, in fact, condoning their behavior. You are consenting to be regulated by the rules there. Your participation is tacit agreement. No way around it.

NA
NA
[snapback]222234[/snapback]​

Look, just because you say it doesn't make it so. for the sake of the argument and to get this thread back on track I will leave it at that.

Rich
 
SamClemmons said:
Yes it does. I am a member of CW. After getting a load of the wrongheaded way the place is policed I refused to post there or interact there in any way. If you are a member there and you post there you are, in fact,  condoning their behavior. You are consenting to be regulated by the rules there. Your participation is tacit agreement. No way around it.

NA
NA
[snapback]222234[/snapback]​

Thanks Neal, you're making me feel better and better all the time about the fact that I can no longer post over there :)
 
Ironworker said:
Look, just because you say it doesn't make it so. for the sake of the argument and to get this thread back on track I will leave it at that.

Rich
[snapback]222241[/snapback]​

Uh, sorry Rich but if Neal says something, it IS so. :D Just accept it and move on ;)
 
coventrycat86 said:
Kinda too bad since I know some good people over there and have been a member in good standing for two years.  I dunno what's up with those guys but they're really starting to make me wonder........

Maybe it's just me but can ANYONE see anything wrong with any of my posts over there?  NONE were deleted or altered by the mods so all the evidence is out there to see.
[snapback]222240[/snapback]​

Bill... There are a lot of good people over there; but the numbers are dwindling... Either people are getting suspended/expelled/ or are disenchanted with how things are being run.

Some of the posts on the site are informative, but most of those particular posters with info are also at both Cigarwise and CF. Increasingly, many are starting to come here to Cigarpass.

Their front page, with info about box code resources and information about cigars is very good. Unfortunately, the forums (crux of the site), has gone to ****. For some inane reason, they protect the thieves. And they have the heaviest censorship of any site I've seen.

After a while, you start to go nuts reading the ISOM HERFING BOTL MOM BPing bull****. And the myriad of smiley faces that they have on the site is enough to cure the world of depression. (or make you go crazy)
 
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
matter a fact I see members of CW who have done more trades than you and are highly respected members of CW posting in this thread.

Rich
[snapback]221979[/snapback]​
LMAO. "are highly respected members of CW"... Buwahahahahahahahaha! CigarWEAKLY. lol. If the moderators at CW refuse to give recourse to their members who have been cheated, robbed or otherwise ripped off then being a "respected" member there means you condone the moderators actions. Respect is not a word that the fellers who run Cweakly are familiar with. You don't strangle the people you respect with invasive and suffocating, punitive and arbitrary rules geared toward keeping your members muzzled. If you are a participating member of Cweakly then you are guilty too. Silence is acquiescence.

NA
[snapback]222086[/snapback]​

Just because someone is a respectable trader of at CW doesn't mean I condone what the moderators have done or the rules they hammer on there members.
I no more of a participating member of CW than you are.

I never implied consent or approval.

Rich
[snapback]222159[/snapback]​
Yes it does. I am a member of CW. After getting a load of the wrongheaded way the place is policed I refused to post there or interact there in any way. If you are a member there and you post there you are, in fact, condoning their behavior. You are consenting to be regulated by the rules there. Your participation is tacit agreement. No way around it.

NA
NA
[snapback]222234[/snapback]​

Look, just because you say it doesn't make it so. for the sake of the argument and to get this thread back on track I will leave it at that.

Rich
[snapback]222241[/snapback]​
Just making the argument. It's pretty cut and dried from my viewpoint. Convince me otherwise.
It's all right, I'm a licensed threadjacker. Badge number 01130.
NA
 
SamClemmons said:
It's all right, I'm a licensed threadjacker. Badge number 01130.
NA
[snapback]222256[/snapback]​


hail.gif
 
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
SamClemmons said:
Ironworker said:
matter a fact I see members of CW who have done more trades than you and are highly respected members of CW posting in this thread.

Rich
[snapback]221979[/snapback]​
LMAO. "are highly respected members of CW"... Buwahahahahahahahaha! CigarWEAKLY. lol. If the moderators at CW refuse to give recourse to their members who have been cheated, robbed or otherwise ripped off then being a "respected" member there means you condone the moderators actions. Respect is not a word that the fellers who run Cweakly are familiar with. You don't strangle the people you respect with invasive and suffocating, punitive and arbitrary rules geared toward keeping your members muzzled. If you are a participating member of Cweakly then you are guilty too. Silence is acquiescence.

NA
[snapback]222086[/snapback]​

Just because someone is a respectable trader of at CW doesn't mean I condone what the moderators have done or the rules they hammer on there members.
I no more of a participating member of CW than you are.

I never implied consent or approval.

Rich
[snapback]222159[/snapback]​
Yes it does. I am a member of CW. After getting a load of the wrongheaded way the place is policed I refused to post there or interact there in any way. If you are a member there and you post there you are, in fact, condoning their behavior. You are consenting to be regulated by the rules there. Your participation is tacit agreement. No way around it.

NA
NA
[snapback]222234[/snapback]​

Look, just because you say it doesn't make it so. for the sake of the argument and to get this thread back on track I will leave it at that.

Rich
[snapback]222241[/snapback]​


That some great reasoning and comeback skills you have there. LMAO.
 
Is there any resolution to this? Will there be any solution to this? Has anyone tried speaking with Jacksi?

This thing could reach 16 pages without anything getting resolved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top