JHolmes763
Drinkin' the koolaid
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,739
Are we going to bang the "Tropicana Sun Tan Girl'?
I fixed that for you and the answer is YES! (at least the girl that's legal!)
Are we going to bang the "Tropicana Sun Tan Girl'?
But you're KING! You've slowly been making this clearer and clearer through the years. Your membership is increasing, but the old timers that helped you establish your KINGDOM are slowly disapearing, or have you noticed? I didn't mean to crap in your coenflakes. I just stated my opinion on the logo, no need to get all up and mighty King Rod.This was mearly a topic for discussion, heaven forbid! Lock it then.
My mother used to call this stomping my feet and pouting...
LOL.... your still sour about alterboy! Stop pouting Lil John... stop pouting.
You obviously didn't read what I said... unless you read it and didn't understand it.Ridiculous.
The "glory days" Michael was talking about were the first couple years here where Michael and others were figuring out how to do things. How passes, trades and sales should be handled, what things should be allowed and what things shouldn't. Everyone who is here now benefit from what Michael and many others contributed to this site. To intimate that his opinion is no more valid than someone who has been here 30 days, or 6 months or a year is not only naive but completely wrong. I don't agree with him on this but to say he should follow a dictum set forth precisely for newbies is the real "hogwash". Let's face it, there are varying degrees of membership here. Longevity while on its face doesn't bestow special privilege it certainly indicates a commitment to this board and should, at the very least, give that member a greater voice.
NA
An "us against them" philosophy is seldom wise.
Alan:Neal has a great point.
Longevity does matter. If some guy who has been here for 3 days came in and started posting like Wilkey he'd likely be run out of here pretty quickly as some kind of "know it all" blowhard. If he came in and statred posting like Neal he'd be run out as some kind of "internet tough guy" who is trying to rule the roost without having the juice to do so.
( The following is bolded so everyone can see I"m NOT bashing Wilkey or Neal)
We all respect Wilkey's and Neal's opinions and well thought out posts because they have been here for a length of time and have proven over that time to truly have the best interest of the board in mind when they post. The same can be said of cohibasurfer.
Longevity does matter. Not as much as what one does with that longevity, however, you can't really do anything over time without having the time.
As far as the original post goes, I think some of the avatars and sigs are a little overboard, but I just don't look at them. It's the same kind of thing that I posted the other day about language. I find some of the language used by some here to be rather offensive. They're free to use it as I am free to not read their posts after discovering it. I think self moderation is likely the best option and it's the option I've taken.
I understand your point here and that you're not picking on Wilkey or Neal but there is a big difference between the two scenarios you presented. Wilkey's posts are "NEVER" anything but helpful and informative and if a newbie emulated that I think people would say to themselves "wow, the guy seems to know a great deal, but alas he is a newb" On the other hand (not singling out Neal or Michael) a newbie coming off as an internet tough guy would get run in a heart beat.
Yes they are. However, many of them have to do with the way things are done around here. There have been several suggestions made by Wilkey that have become part of how this site works. If a 3 day newb came in and posted the same stuff, he be told to not try to change the way things are done and leave if he doesn't like it (as he should be). We take Wilkey's suggestions to heart because we know by his participation here over time that he truly has the best interests of all of us in mind.
That's all I'm saying.
Opinions vary!
But you're KING! You've slowly been making this clearer and clearer through the years. Your membership is increasing, but the old timers that helped you establish your KINGDOM are slowly disapearing, or have you noticed? I didn't mean to crap in your coenflakes. I just stated my opinion on the logo, no need to get all up and mighty King Rod.This was mearly a topic for discussion, heaven forbid! Lock it then.
He's on a roll boys, hide the women and children.I don't see anyone posting X Rated material, nor do I see any sigtags or avatars which even boarder on being X Rated. The purpose of CP is to allow everyone to have a good time, and not be so constrained with all of the "PC" BS we have to deal with on the outside.
I am curious as to why a few people on CP find the logo offensive. Is your mind that far in the gutter? Let me explain our logo, as I really don't think everyone quite understands it... This is CigarPass - a community based around trading and passing cigars. Back when I started working on the site (back in 1999), I wanted a logo that would represent who we are and what we're about. The lady sitting on the flying cigar is just that, a lady sitting on a flying cigar. She's not straddling it nor is she doing a "monica" with it. Get it? Cigar Pass = Passing cigars to one another. The cigar is traveling, and the lady is flying on it... Does this make sense now? I have failed to see where people find the logo offensive; all I can say to that is that your mind really has to be in the gutter to find the CP logo offensive. I'm a big fan of WWII/Military nose art, and I wanted CP to have that retro artistic look. In no way did I want anything less than a classy design to CP. Maybe we should ban pictures of witches flying on brooms for Halloween, since after all, that too could be construed as offensive, right?
I believe in letting people express themselves as long as they don't cross the line. Sure, there are a ton of avatars/sig pics with beautiful woman in them. I would school your daughter on exactly what "porn" really is, because CP is not even close to being called a "porn" site.
Two options - 1.) Turn off sigtags and avatars like others have suggested, or 2.) View CigarPass when you know you're daughter won't be sneaking up on you. CigarPass is not a kid-friendly site, technically speaking you're supposed to be 18+ to participate since we're a tobacco related community.
As far as the poll goes, I voted "NULL".
Hope this clarifies my stance on the issue.
Opinions vary!
But you're KING! You've slowly been making this clearer and clearer through the years. Your membership is increasing, but the old timers that helped you establish your KINGDOM are slowly disapearing, or have you noticed? I didn't mean to crap in your coenflakes. I just stated my opinion on the logo, no need to get all up and mighty King Rod.This was mearly a topic for discussion, heaven forbid! Lock it then.
The lady sitting on the flying cigar is just that, a lady sitting on a flying cigar. She's not straddling it nor is she doing a "monica" with it. Get it?
He's on a roll boys, hide the women and children.I don't see anyone posting X Rated material, nor do I see any sigtags or avatars which even boarder on being X Rated. The purpose of CP is to allow everyone to have a good time, and not be so constrained with all of the "PC" BS we have to deal with on the outside.
I am curious as to why a few people on CP find the logo offensive. Is your mind that far in the gutter? Let me explain our logo, as I really don't think everyone quite understands it... This is CigarPass - a community based around trading and passing cigars. Back when I started working on the site (back in 1999), I wanted a logo that would represent who we are and what we're about. The lady sitting on the flying cigar is just that, a lady sitting on a flying cigar. She's not straddling it nor is she doing a "monica" with it. Get it? Cigar Pass = Passing cigars to one another. The cigar is traveling, and the lady is flying on it... Does this make sense now? I have failed to see where people find the logo offensive; all I can say to that is that your mind really has to be in the gutter to find the CP logo offensive. I'm a big fan of WWII/Military nose art, and I wanted CP to have that retro artistic look. In no way did I want anything less than a classy design to CP. Maybe we should ban pictures of witches flying on brooms for Halloween, since after all, that too could be construed as offensive, right?
I believe in letting people express themselves as long as they don't cross the line. Sure, there are a ton of avatars/sig pics with beautiful woman in them. I would school your daughter on exactly what "porn" really is, because CP is not even close to being called a "porn" site.
Two options - 1.) Turn off sigtags and avatars like others have suggested, or 2.) View CigarPass when you know you're daughter won't be sneaking up on you. CigarPass is not a kid-friendly site, technically speaking you're supposed to be 18+ to participate since we're a tobacco related community.
As far as the poll goes, I voted "NULL".
Hope this clarifies my stance on the issue.
Opinions vary!
But you're KING! You've slowly been making this clearer and clearer through the years. Your membership is increasing, but the old timers that helped you establish your KINGDOM are slowly disapearing, or have you noticed? I didn't mean to crap in your coenflakes. I just stated my opinion on the logo, no need to get all up and mighty King Rod.This was mearly a topic for discussion, heaven forbid! Lock it then.
NA
Does it just sit there Ray or is it supposed to do something?<--- Time for a new avatar.
LMAO!<--- Time for a new avatar.
Does it just sit there Ray or is it supposed to do something?<--- Time for a new avatar.
NA
...and he's from NH. We all know what puritans they are. Hell, it's a sex crime to take a leak on the side of the road.I think the cp logo is sweet. Nothing offensive about it at all.
I'm going to get a hat and wear it around .
Me too. All ya get is his fuggin' profile.Does it just sit there Ray or is it supposed to do something?<--- Time for a new avatar.
NA
I was wonderin' the same thing Neal; hell, I even clicked on the thing to see if anything would happen.
Is the sexy, cartoon broad straddling the phallic cigar - the symbol that is the Cigar Pass logo - included in your concerns? Is that to be removed as well?
I can vaguely see your point and am inclined to respectfully disagree more than agree. On the whole, a majority of the dames posted are done so within the confines of a single thread, usually with NSFW nomenclature. In terms of avatars and sig pics - to place such confines on those is a bit over the top. Yes, this is a cigar forum, so do we eliminate all tangental topics? Sports? Poker? Libations? Its a slippery slope and where to draw the line becomes increasingly tenuous as one travels down a road such as you suggest. To set such confines becomes difficult in that who then decides what is acceptable? Is it the proverbial "I know it when I see it" test? Or do we, once chicks are eliminated/banned, then start banning anything else someone finds offensive - like a picture of Matt R. as an avatar? :laugh: Kidding aside, I trust you can see the point - the next stop is to ban/restrict other things which may be funny or amusing to some in a childish, frat-boy type of way.
Most of us are adults here and if there are concerns about who is going to be peering over your shoulder while you view the forum, then the options are relatively simple - pick a more discerning time to view the forum, disable sig pics as the wise Wilkey has already pointed out, or we do away with everything other than cigars and cigars only. The sound, reasonable option seems pretty clear to me.