I would request a BBMF be sent to Local669 for my wish.
Jim
Nice of you to offer up your wish to Mark, but A Monte 2 and a PSD4 for a BBMF? You're in essence trading 2 easily obtainables that equal ~ $18 for a HTF Opus?? I thought you've already been through this before...I know, I know, it's going to someone else, but that's not the point. If you want someone to put up a HTF (even if it is for someone else) , then I imagine you'd need to trade off one too. JMO though
This is a point of discussion and perhaps there is no straightforward answer. To quote from the opening post , Rule #5:
5. Generally speaking, it's in poor taste to ask for something ultra rare and expensive when you've granted a wish for something much more modest. Sometimes you might get lucky but you don't want to hold up the thread for challenging wishes although there is no limit to what you may wish for.
As you pointed out, Brian, this grant/wish pair is complicated by two factors, an apparent breach of Rule #5 on value and a counter move involving an exercise of generosity.
This is PIF is not exactly a Pass and so no explicit "equal value" requirement exists. Because it is a PIF, I believe it's reasonable to allow some flex so that over the course of a half-dozen or dozen cycles, cigar values can migrate allowing those with more modest capabilities to play along side those with more expensive tastes. Does this mean a "two-cheap = one expensive" allowance is permissible? I'm not so sure but I don't think so.
IMO, the granter is
required to grant only
one cigar on the wish list. That many have chosen to grant several or all on a wisher's list is their prerogative but is not and should not become the standard. It should not become the expectation.
In this case, I believe that the value of the more expensive of the two sticks be taken as the guide value of the wish granted. On this basis it would be about $10 for the MC2.
Now, if S13 had asked for a BBMF for himself, I think one might be justified in calling a "poor play." Since he transferred the wish to another specific individual, does that outweigh the uneven pairing? I don't think so. I m thinking in terms of potential abuse of the system. If this were allowed, then it is not unreasonable to conceive of a case where two or more players collude or scheme to get HTF or expensive cigars directed to each other. I am not insinuating that is the case here at all but am presenting a hypothetical "what if" to plug any potential loop holes or assaults on the integrity and goodwill of this PIF.
These are just my thoughts and I have not been keeping a close eye on things but this one seems like an important issue to be resolved. Please share your ideas and criticisms. It would be especially helpful if in making a point, you could point to a specific grant/wish pair as a concrete example.
Wilkey