NiteSeer
New Member
What a bummer! Next thing you know they will pass a law saying no cigar smoking in one's backyard.
Yes this is the case (as far as I can find). Carlito and Padron are good, so we can all calm down about that. After that my home away from home will never be the same.Recent article expains that we have 60 days...
http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/567725.html
if this is true... we are a GO for the Carlito event.
I also guess it is time to get one of these to wear when I go out.
![]()
I support smoking bans in public places. I like smoking bans in resturants, I don't want to smell someones smoke when I'm trying to enjoy a meal.
I disagree. I also don't much care for the smell of cigarette smoke while I am trying to enjoy my meal, but that doesn't mean it should be outlawed.
I believe that the owner of the restaurant should have the right to decide the smoking policy of the establishment he owns and shouldn't be forced to do what he doesn't feel is in the best interest of his business. If enough people want a non-smoking establishment, then there would be someone there to capitalize on that market. If you don't like the owner's rules complain to the owner or manager, not to the law makers.
Oh, but I guess I can always smoke at the casino, since they payed for the ballet initiative, and it just so happens to exempt them from the ban :angry:
I wonder if that would fly with this ban as in the text of the ballot it says "smoking in enclosed places of employment" which is what I assume is being used to prevent smoking at a tobacco shop, as they have employees.The other did a totally different thing. They no longer have employees, but co-owners! That is being challenged by the city and will be in court soon they say. Don't look too good is the rumor.
While the anti-smoking agenda pisses me off, I have no problem with this particular aspect of it.Some places have already banned smoking in your car. I think it applies if minor children are present.
Why stop with the car? Why not extend the law to cover smoking indoors in homes with less that XXX square feet...?? How about within XX feet of a kid, no matter where you are? Why not ticket parents that take their kids to McDonalds more than four times a year? How about parents that let their kids watch too much TV? You are running towards the edge of a very slippery slope, my friend.While the anti-smoking agenda pisses me off, I have no problem with this particular aspect of it.Some places have already banned smoking in your car. I think it applies if minor children are present.
Indian casinos are on sovereign land, where US laws don't necessarily apply. Same story here in Washington, Oregon....anywhere with an Indian casino.The casino exception is a crock of sh!t IMO.
Indian casinos are on sovereign land, where US laws don't necessarily apply. Same story here in Washington, Oregon....anywhere with an Indian casino.The casino exception is a crock of sh!t IMO.
B.B.S.
All I have to say on the philosophy of this social political situation can be summed up in three quotes from John Locke.Why stop with the car? Why not extend the law to cover smoking indoors in homes with less that XXX square feet...?? How about within XX feet of a kid, no matter where you are? Why not ticket parents that take their kids to McDonalds more than four times a year? How about parents that let their kids watch too much TV? You are running towards the edge of a very slippery slope, my friend.While the anti-smoking agenda pisses me off, I have no problem with this particular aspect of it.Some places have already banned smoking in your car. I think it applies if minor children are present.
No, I wouldn't smoke with little kids in the car but frankly that's the last thing I want the police to focus on. I think as a society we have bigger concerns than to burden our enforcement mechanism with draconian laws that are supposed to "protect" people from legal behavior that very likely hurts no one but the person involved.
< Set RantMode ="Off" >
Regards - B.B.S.
Unfortunately this mindset has all but been eliminated from most of Western culture (and likely most others, as well, but I don't have any personal experience with those cultures). The movement to alleviate one from liberty began many years ago and has sunk it's teeth deeply into the fabric of our lives. The people responsible for this type of nonsense are completely focused on bringing about a different United States than that which has flourished for the last 200+ years. They are fully entrenched in this task while most of the rest of the population is not paying any attention. Complacency will one day come back to haunt us all, but by then it will be too late. It seems that the only people willing to fight are those that want to force their way of thinking and way of life onto others in an effort to "make a difference."All I have to say on the philosophy of this social political situation can be summed up in three quotes from John Locke.
1-- “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom."
2-- "Government has no other end, but the preservation of property.”
3-- “Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.”
Make your own choices and be responsible for the consequences. Some choices preclude others.
Some places have already banned smoking in your car. I think it applies if minor children are present.