NullSmurf
Das Bruce
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 7,858
Agreed that this is interesting data, but I wish we had some frame of reference as to where the KLH and the Viper beads compare to this data. I'm guessing the gel refers to the not bead silica that appears like jelly when hydrated. I can understand why its performance was poor since there would only be very little surface area as compared to beads. Likewise, the bead silica maintains significantly more surface area and is able to absorb/desorb much more efficiently.
I'm less concerned now about whether a metal salt is used as a conditioner. It could eventually be corrosive to the hygro circuitry and metal box clasps, but that would take years.
I'm less concerned now about whether a metal salt is used as a conditioner. It could eventually be corrosive to the hygro circuitry and metal box clasps, but that would take years.
Has anyone been able to determine the "type" of silica gel that the KLH and beads are? Reading 3.2 points towards three specific "types" of Silica gel used for their testing. Are these just brand names used in the museum industry? I guess I'm trying to understand if and how the KLH silica gel is manufactured different than the Silica gel beads and if they are the same or different than the Silica Gel used for the article. <snip>