Here puffy, puffy, puffy....here

[CoventryCat86]

By the way, you owe Al an apology. I still haven't seen that.

Well then you need to go back and look at post #40:

As far as my "apology" to discdog, I'm sorry I used some strong words but I still have a great deal of concern with the three versions of the story about what's going on here between he and gmiranda33 and those who claim I was "defending" gmiranda. My concern is that there are three vastly different versions of what happened here and those who equate my concern with "defending" are wrong headed.

No. That's an apology to discdog. I said Al.

Who is Al?

 

[BkCloud114]

Al = puffstuff

 

[tigger]

So I guess the only question remaining is whether it's '06 or '07 for which this all will get the Best Drama In a Cigar Board award from the academy

 

[CoventryCat86]

Here's a link for guys that aren't sure how this all got started. Discdog, Gabe and several others go by the same name they do here, Saint Luis Rey is Coventry Cat. This is only to clarify how this got started and hopefully will be the end to all this.

Al

And you know this how precisely? I would ask that you please refrain from posting information that you do not know to be true.

Also, I thought Rod locked the Torano thread because he asked all of us to

Keep this bullshit at the "cesspool" where it belongs, please.

???

 

[Zeebra]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

 

[theorangeman]

I have a feeling that this thread is very close to being closed. :whistling:

 

[SamClemmons]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

 

[Rod]

No zebra, you are in no position to make statements on what I think because I do not "think (I'm) abov (sic) the law" this is another "false accusation" from you.

I have to disagree with you there, Bill. It's pretty clear you do in fact think you're above the rules here.

Not "everyone" zebra. I've been here longer than 80% of the rest of the membership.

Bill, just because you claim to have been here 80% longer than the rest of the membership does NOT entitle you to act the way you do, and continually belittle new members. You really should take some of your own advice, and "read more, post less".

this really has nothing to do with it. I've been here longer than 85% of the rest of the membership and have been active the for the entire time I've been here.

So again, your time here nor your post count gives you any right to act the way you do, with the snide remarks and baiting tactics. Your activity here has become more negative than positive.

You sure seem to be extremely intolerant of people (one of which is obviously me) who rub you the wrong way so much so that it blinds you from being objective and fair.

Bill, why don't stop digging the grave deeper? You're not making any sense. What you're accusing Zeebra of is EXACTLY your problem. You are the one who is "intolerant" of people. I have yet to see Zeebra go off on someone; he's been a very fair member of this community. You, Bill, are the one who continually goes off on tangents and thrives off drama.

Does the term "practice what you preach" mean anything to you?

Does it mean anything to you, Bill?

You really need to go back and read some of your posts. You don't make any sense. You come on CP every day and bring all the drama with you. I'm sick of your lame comments. You act as if this is Bill's little website, and you can do/say anything you like without repercussions.

I wish the three people who PM'd me this morning would also chime in and say how they really feel. It's ashame we have so many members, new and OLD (been here for 4+ years) are sick of your attitude and poor disposition, Bill.

Also, I thought Rod locked the Torano thread because he asked all of us to...

Bill, this issue is now about you. This thread will remain open.

Either knock off the drama, or your account will be suspended. Perhaps you need to take some time away from the forum for awhile. If you want to keep it going, then the suspension will become permanent, and it will be un-reversible. Your choice.

 

[NullSmurf]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Is that a threat, Neal?

 

[SamClemmons]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Is that a threat, Neal?

Why? You looking for a fight Nully?

NA

 

[Zeebra]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

 

[SamClemmons]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

Geezus. And you know these to be definitive truths? Do you dismiss the possibility that there is no "right" side in this? Let me tell you what is childish. Grown ass men blowing smoke up each others dresses. It makes for an entertaining read and I enjoy it immensely but it's still childish.

NA

 

[NullSmurf]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Is that a threat, Neal?

Why? You looking for a fight Nully?

NA

Absolutely not. I find it distasteful, but sometimes necessary. Do you have a problem with Zeebra? You've gone to the trouble of coming up with the cutsie varient of his screen name.

 

[Zeebra]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

Geezus. And you know these to be definitive truths? Do you dismiss the possibility that there is no "right" side in this? Let me tell you what is childish. Grown ass men blowing smoke up each others dresses. It makes for an entertaining read and I enjoy it immensely but it's still childish.

NA

I know that Al had first hand knowledge of what transpired with Gabriel as he was there and heard the conversation over a speaker phone. Bill's knowledge of the events comes from what's been posted on message boards. So for me to believe one version over the other, I'll take the guy who was actually there when it all happened.

 

[SamClemmons]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Is that a threat, Neal?

Why? You looking for a fight Nully?

NA

Absolutely not. I find it distasteful, but sometimes necessary. Do you have a problem with Zeebra? You've gone to the trouble of coming up with the cutsie varient of his screen name.

I've been calling him "zeebar" since we used to hang out in the chatroom. He never had a problem with it before... and it wasn't that much trouble.

NA

 

[SamClemmons]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

Geezus. And you know these to be definitive truths? Do you dismiss the possibility that there is no "right" side in this? Let me tell you what is childish. Grown ass men blowing smoke up each others dresses. It makes for an entertaining read and I enjoy it immensely but it's still childish.

NA

I know that Al had first hand knowledge of what transpired with Gabriel as he was there and heard the conversation over a speaker phone. Bill's knowledge of the events comes from what's been posted on message boards. So for me to believe one version over the other, I'll take the guy who was actually there when it all happened.

Just to be clear here. Discdog's version and Al's version are different. Which one do you believe?

NA

 

[Zeebra]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

Geezus. And you know these to be definitive truths? Do you dismiss the possibility that there is no "right" side in this? Let me tell you what is childish. Grown ass men blowing smoke up each others dresses. It makes for an entertaining read and I enjoy it immensely but it's still childish.

NA

I know that Al had first hand knowledge of what transpired with Gabriel as he was there and heard the conversation over a speaker phone. Bill's knowledge of the events comes from what's been posted on message boards. So for me to believe one version over the other, I'll take the guy who was actually there when it all happened.

Just to be clear here. Discdog's version and Al's version are different. Which one do you believe?

NA

Oh good lord. When stories get posted on message boards, they have a tendency to read differently based on who's reading or who's writing. Some folks such as yourself are quite eloquent in their writing styles, and can make a point quite clearly. Others can ramble, and mess things up. Discdog's version and Al's version are the same story in essense. If the fine details of the story are a bit mangled in the telling of it, that's in no way a reflection of one or the other lying.

 

[CoventryCat86]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

I honestly did not know who "Al" was so you are dead wrong, I do not "know(s) full well who Al is" Wasn't that pretty clear when you asked me about why I had not apologized to "Al" and I responded that I did by quoting my apology to discdog?

Now how about you admit you were "wrong?"

 

[NullSmurf]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Is that a threat, Neal?

Why? You looking for a fight Nully?

NA

Absolutely not. I find it distasteful, but sometimes necessary. Do you have a problem with Zeebra? You've gone to the trouble of coming up with the cutsie varient of his screen name.

I've been calling him "zeebar" since we used to hang out in the chatroom. He never had a problem with it before... and it wasn't that much trouble.

NA

Engage away, then. I didn't know yall were buddies.

 

[Zeebra]

Right on cue Bill. Bravo. You're quite predictable.

You lookin' for a fight there zeebar?

NA

Not at all. I'm just pointing out the fact that Bill gets involved in these threads, then doesn't apologize when he's in the wrong. His little comment about "Who is Al"? is really childish considering "puffstuff" has been signing his name as Al on most of his posts. In the past, Bill has also pointed out to members the difference between puffstuff and puffnstuff. So he knows full well who Al is, he just doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

I honestly did not know who "Al" was so you are dead wrong, I do not "know(s) full well who Al is" Wasn't that pretty clear when you asked me about why I had not apologized to "Al" and I responded that I did by quoting my apology to discdog?

Now how about you admit you were "wrong?"

I don't believe you. If you didn't know who Al was before, you do now and you still haven't made ammends.