Second hand you got donked on so lets not talk about it. First hand there are a couple of plays I don't like, although UTG+1 clearly donked you there too. First, you got three bet by UTG+1 to 36BB (which is pretty gross) then smooth called when someone else cold called the action. I hate that play there because it lets in the unknown, why not at least thin the field so when the Ace hits you don't need to vomit? I would bump it to 5 or 6. The flop bet given the pre-flop action makes some sense but it is a weird line. What I mean is, you called the raise pre-flop I would assume to induce action on a weak flop and you got your weak flop. Why not bet 1/2 pot to get them to chase? Now, when your buddy in UTG+1 min-raises I think it is time to push right there. If you just call you have $1200 behind on the turn with a roughly $2100 pot. You are leading the turn so anything less than a push leaves you with not enough behind to matter. Unless you want to induce a bluff by check raising the turn I would rather commit on the flop, and if you re-raised PF you aren't going to be that worried about sets here either. Obviously you are giving up some of your equity since you are ahead often and can extract value later, but leaving yourself in a bad chip position doesn't do you any good either. You are ahead most of the time here so don't let him control the hand and see cards when he wants to. Pushing the flop forces him to commit while behind, where as your turn bet was only 1/3 pot (versus your almost 3/4 pot bet on the flop) and leaves you with nothing behind to control a scary river or make a solid value bet anyways. I don't think your play was bad, just inviting a suckout, but I also don't know some key info about the other players involved in the PF action that really affects which line to take.
I definitely could have played the hand differenty, but with no flush and straight draws, I knew exactly where I was standing through the turn. Given the player that hit the river had been at the same table with me for a few hours, and it was pretty obvious I only took the aggressive stance when I had the best hand (I made sure players knew this by showing my hands, to prevent donks). So given I was playing ultra-tight against a player for a few hours, he knew that Top pair was no good here which was why it took him forever to call. After the hand was over he looked at me and said "I figured I was beat, I just figured I'd gamble there because I've won so much this weekend." When he said that, I realized that no matter how I played it, he probably would have called it anyways "just to see." Hence why I considered it a suck-out instead of using the loss to critique and analyze my play.
That's the positives and negatives of poker. In hindsight, you can always play hands differently and critique your play against people after being involved in pots with them. Poker is an ever-learning game, that's why I love it. Now, did I use that to my advantage later, knowing that he'd gamble with me....well, yes...he doubled me up from the min buy-in just a few hands later...when I shoved post-flop on him with AA.
Live and learn. :blush:
Jake my thoughts are it's an acceptable trade as long as it works both ways. Can I take the Pan with an Anjeo 46? Just my .02
Brian
Remember, this won't always be the case. Some passers are generous by nature...putting a cigar with rarity at the same value for a non-rare cigar, etc. For example, let's take Robbies P/T of the Cojonus. He took a 2003 Cojonu and put a 2009 Cojonu that currently can only be purchased directly at the factory by locals, and isn't even released yet to stores. The MSRP's here are probably similar...but given that this is an OR Cojonu, and not available yet....someone putting a Cojonu 2003 and taking the 2009 simply wouldn't work as the MSRP's are similar, and the rarity is on the take...not the put. So there is no $ amt. that can be used between these two cigars or this particular trade that would justify the trade working both ways.
Similarly, taking a Illusione ~2~ at roughly $8 and putting a Opus Perf #5 at $8 would not work both ways given the rarity of an Opus.
Now that being considered, Rarity on puts would make up for a $ differential in MSRP. How much? Well, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. My whole point is that P/T's won't always be able to "work both ways."
That being said...anybody have a problem with the:
T: Anejo 46 /// P: Padron #35