I understand this is a "bigger than board" issue, but I agree with the assessment that Tim is responsible. It's how we've done it, why change it now just because we're dealing with VHTF cigars/fakes? Spiffy sold OR Anejos that he's made claim that weren't fake. They turned out to be, and he was made responsible. He's made good on everything now, and good for him. The key word to me in this situation is "precedence."
I have to agree with this. Tim arranged the sale, the money went to him, the cigars came from him.
He should refund those who want refunds, in exchange for them returning the cigars to him in the same shape they were shipped to them.
It's then his problem to get reimbursed from the original seller of the cigars (and then in turn, it's Allan's problem to get reimbursed from Bruce, and Bruce from his source, and so on and so forth).
If you no longer have the cigars you purchased from Tim, or they have been damaged in any way in the interim, you're out of luck, IMO.
Or if he really feels he should be abdicated of any responsibility, at worst, he should post Allan's, address and phone number, and say "Here, go get 'em"
Not exactly true, Andrew. It's my understanding that the cigars were shipped directly from the collector. I could be wrong as I haven't discussed this with Tim directly.
For the record, I agree with those who state that Tim was not directly responsible here. I hear Jon on his post, though. It's quite the conundrum. I do know that Tim is a good guy that would never knowingly defraud anyone.
Tim was my point of contact and who I wrote and mailed the checks to. The cigars were mailed from someone else at a different location though. Can't remember any specifics though.
Since some of you guys started asking for his head on a plate, I doubt highly we will hear anything from Tim.
Since some of you guys started asking for his head on a plate, I doubt highly we will hear anything from Tim.
Dago was the first. Just put me in Tony's camp that Tim saying anything won't make a difference or provide closure and I'll be done with this.
Like I said I don't agree with how Tim is handling this, I also don't agree that he is the one that needs to pay anyone back. He should provide the name and address of person he brokered the cigars for (while doing a favor for the CP members who like these type of cigars) say he's sorry and leave again.
I put the blame on the people all over the online cigar world who have been suspecting these were fakes for years and did nothing about it. Thus letting hundreds of people lose their hard earned money.
Super happy this is coming out now, really mad that it didn't come out sooner, and really sad that Tim is going to take the brunt of the blame here for being "the messenger".
*edit* And Jon I got mad at Dago for his "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay mooooooooooooooooooooooooooore reliable" comment. Other than being the broker for this deal Tim hasn't a blemish on his reputation here at CP, so Dago's comment was uncalled for.
<snip>
And to be right up front about my opinion, if Tim decides to run and hide then he deserves any and all wrath he ends up pulling down upon himself and I'll step back and out of the matter.
<snip>
If he doesn't, well then... TALLY-HO!
He was more of a salesman, IMO.
Yeah your right Doc, I'm just making sure my point is made. now its up to Tim to vindicate my effort, something I just don't think is going to happen.
Doc is right and Tim was given every chance to address the issue. Shawn you have been a good friend, but this one is in the books as they say.
Phil great job on this whole issue as well as the cast of thousands that added to bringing this out to the open.
Phil great job on this whole issue as well as the cast of thousands that added to bringing this out to the open.
That being the case, I think if Tim posted "Sorry... here's the guy's contact info", I think that'd be reasonable.Not exactly true, Andrew. It's my understanding that the cigars were shipped directly from the collector. I could be wrong as I haven't discussed this with Tim directly.
For the record, I agree with those who state that Tim was not directly responsible here. I hear Jon on his post, though. It's quite the conundrum. I do know that Tim is a good guy that would never knowingly defraud anyone.