But as stated earlier do not go by bands alone to determine authenticity.
Absolutely true. In my opinion, there is not one killer way to determine that a cigar is
genuine, well aside from having an individual who is experienced with the particular item actually smoke it. There are a whole host of considerations that must be considered.
As a scientist, I go about proving and disproving claims by stating a null hypothesis and then disproving it. For example, in this case, it is most useful to set a null hypothesis as: "This cigar is authentic." Stated in this way, one can proceed to identify factors which disprove this hypothesis.
The reason it's more effective to proceed in this fashion has to do with the nature of scientific knowledge. There is one school of thought that holds that a truth is impossible to prove with absolute certainty. In other words, we can accumulate evidence after evidence but doubt may always be raised. There may always be a weak link.
However, if instead, we seek to disprove a proposition (which is actually the opposite of what we
really wanted to prove), we need only find one conclusive piece of information that contradicts the truthfulness of our claim.
So, in this case it would have gone something like this:
Null hypothesis: This Bolivar Coronas is genuine.
Contradictory Evidence:
1. bright glowing Cuban seal stamp paper
2. non-standard box code format
3. Habanos insert on wrong paper and with erroneous details
4. lack of "triple cap" appearance
5. smoked like rolled up gutter debris
and so on.
At one point, the totality of the evidence becomes overwhelming and then we must reject the hypothesis that the cigar is genuine. The ultimate result being, that we have determined that the cigar is indeed fake.
BTW, I am in possession of this box of Coronas now and will start a detailed analysis of all the components of this box. I think it will provide an object lesson in evidence to consider when scrutinizing cigars of dubious authenticity.
Wilkey