Ok, I thought about it some more, and I may have jumped to conclusions in the heat of the moment. Therefore, I take back what I said about cockroaches.In my book, snitches are the scum of the earth, along with rapists, child molestors and cockroaches. They deserve whatever payback they get from others, and then some.Stooping to that level won't help. Spreading the word will.
As much as it's a big world...the cigar world is a little smaller!
You may want to rethink what you just stated.
Edit - adding fuel to the fire, in that way, does not help. Simply spreading the word and not buy...that hurts more!
Not if it's paid with a credit card. Once the packages are refused and sent back, a refund can be requested. Dan, however, would not be able to recoup his shipping costs.Now I'm thinking about ordering a whole bunch of stuff from him in separate orders and rejecting all the packages when they get here.
Why? You'd have to pay for it up front, how is that hurting him?
Don't get carried away here. The moral high ground is to vote with your pocketbook. More than that isn't called for and reflects badly on the rest of us.In my book, snitches are the scum of the earth, along with rapists, child molestors and cockroaches. They deserve whatever payback they get from others, and then some.
i realize that i am taking my life in my hands here. i've lived over half a century and smoked cigars for more than half of that time. i've worked for big companies and currently have owned my own small business for over ten years. i know how ruthless people in business can be. i also know that i, personally, have to hear both sides of any argument.
please realize that i am NOT disputing anything that has been said here. however, i have no knowledge of exactly what was said and to whom. with that in mind, i sent an email to the banned vendor asking for his side of this. i only wanted to be fair.
i got a reply that i found interesting. i am not posting it as i'm sure everyone has their minds set. if a consensus would be interested to see it and the admin ok's it i would post it. totally up to you guys.
i am not trying to take sides here, i just want fairness to prevail. if he's guilty as charged, then off with his head. but if there is no opposing side heard, how can it be fair?
Nothing was said, it was written. So no opposing side is needed. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and yes it's fair. You don't need testimony from someone who puts something in writing. Just to clarify, I am not the only vendor this is happening to over here. This is not an Al and Rod Lynching, numerous long time members and vendors have been involved. I was just the one that spoke up about it. These longtime members and vendors have reviewed the proof, made there feelings known and this vendor was banned by consensus, not by Rod.
Al
Don't get carried away here. The moral high ground is to vote with your pocketbook. More than that isn't called for and reflects badly on the rest of us.
Rod please close this one and pin it if you can.