I've read through all this but it's been a while, does the letter come by registered mail?
From what I've heard, at least for the letter that requires a response is sent registered mail.
I've read through all this but it's been a while, does the letter come by registered mail?
oh sheet
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $820 for dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: Between January 2005 and December 2005, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $1,071.90 for dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: Between September 2004 and February 2005, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $6,088.85 for allegedly dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: OFAC alleged that between September 2003 and August 2006, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC. The individual provided information to OFAC concerning additional purchases of Cuban-origin cigars.
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $1,261.00 for allegedly dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: In January 2006, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $2,304.00 for allegedly dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: In January, March, April, June, November, December 2005 and March 2006, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling $1,311.00 for allegedly dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest: In December 2004, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
One individual was assessed a penalty totaling $856.00 for allegedly dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest. On or about October 4, 2002, July 10, and November 3, 2003, the individual purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet. The individual did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.
From my reading of the OFAC documents, it seems as if "penalty" means the person simply paid the fine listed in the Prepenalty notice. A "settlement" suggests that the individual communicated with OFAC to get the fine down from the initial amount. If this is an accurate reading, it's even more troubling since it would mean the $6,088 settlement was initially larger.This may have been answered before in the thread, but I was wondering if it is of any signifigance that they differentiate between "One individual has agreed to a settlement totaling..." and "One individual was assessed a penalty totaling"
Yes. This is all public information provided through the equivalent of press releases. I suppose they are having the intended effect.Wilkey,
That info is right on the OFAC website....right?
Los Angeles, June 13 – The government office responsible for monitoring violations of the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba has U.S. cigar smokers in its sights.
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), a department of the U.S. Treasury, has handed out seven penalties so far this year with fines totaling $13,712.75 to Americans who “purchased Cuban-origin cigars offered for sale on the Internet.”
That’s a high level of enforcement compared to past years. For example, in all of 2006, OFAC handed out only two such penalties, and late in the year, with fines totaling $2,189. Most of the penalties issued by OFAC to individuals prior to the fourth quarter of last year were for unauthorized travel to Cuba or the sale of goods or services by companies without an OFAC license to do so.
In the cigar cases handed down so far this year, penalties ranged from a low of $820 to a high of $6,088.85 for violations ranging from a single case to multiple instances:
• April: a fine of $820.00 for an individual who bought Cuban cigars on the Internet in 2005.
• April: a fine of $1,071.90 for an individual who bought cigars in 2004 and 2005.
• May: a fine of $6,088.85 for an individual who bought cigars from 2003-06.
• May: a fine of $1,261.00 for an individual who bought cigars in 2006.
• June: a fine of $856.00 for an individual who bought cigars in 2002-03.
• June: a fine of $1,311.00 for an individual who bought cigars in 2004.
• June: a fine of $2,304.00 for an individual who bought cigars in 2005-06.
It’s worth noticing that as OFAC acquires records of transactions going back as far as five years, it is imposing fines, no doubt based on the number and size of the violations. In addition, OFAC has sent letters to smokers with U.S. addresses who are suspected of being customers of Internet sites which ship Havana cigars into the United States. So while the practice continues, the U.S. Government has increased its vigilance of the Cuban cigar trade into the U.S.
In case you had any doubts, the language of the current Cuban cigar regulations, issued in September 2004, read:
“There is now an across the board ban on the importation into the United States of Cuban-origin cigars and other Cuban-origin tobacco products, as well as most other products of Cuban origin. This prohibition extends to such products acquired in Cuba, irrespective of whether a traveler is licensed by OFAC to engage in Cuba travel-related transactions, and to such products acquired in third countries by any U.S. traveler, including purchases at duty free shops. Importation of these Cuban goods is prohibited whether the goods are purchased directly by the importer or given to the importer as a gift. Similarly, the import ban extends to Cuban-origin tobacco products offered for sale over the Internet or through the catalog mail purchases.”
Is OFAC seriously impeding the flow of Cuban cigars into the U.S. with these penalties? Probably not. But forewarned is forearmed: OFAC is watching you.
It seems that the article could have been written by someone who read this thread.
It still does not say HOW they are obtaining the information.
Thanks for your work, Wilkey!
Gary,It seems that the article could have been written by someone who read this thread.
It still does not say HOW they are obtaining the information.
Thanks for your work, Wilkey!
I agree with what Grateful1 has said. The article seems to be a broad generalization of the facts and a general "heads up" tone associated with the reporting.
Furthermore, there were a couple of loose ends not tied up (I believe Wilkey was in the process of finding out some answers):
1) what order are the OFAC folks using to send letters. For example, there are various offenders who have been caught between the years of 2002 and 2006, however the list shows inconsistencies in when those penalized purchased their cigars.
2) as stated above, HOW did OFAC come upon these transaction lists? This seems to be the most mysterious aspect of all the occurrences to date. Was it from third party payment institutions?
I suppose more information could be gleaned from hard work, but in the end I'd like to personally thank Wilkey for all that he's personally done on this most informative thread.
Darren
4-5 hours a night, thus my recent zombification.Wilkey,
Thanks for your diligence in this matter. With a family, two kids, your continuing education and job, I wonder if you actually sleep.
One question, do these fines continue to relate to vendors in the Hong Kong market or has OFAC started to move to other sections of the globe?