stevehawk said:From a quick review of the comments made so far, I'm guessing the following numbers are all the same cigar:
49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 58a and 58b
Clues:
- cigar size
- ash color/density
- even/consistent burn
- sweet/citrus taste
- tougher draw
- sloppy cap
Based on these numbers, I'd hazard a guess that all cigars between 49 and 58 are the same. Lumberg, what do ya say?
[snapback]223387[/snapback]
Right. Now you can be more liberal with your pollution.... spread it around,ya know? Buwahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa. Ahem. lmao.Lumberg said:I like that someone started this thread. Now I don't have to pollute the other thread with "this is great, keep 'em coming@!" or "new identity revealed."
[snapback]223368[/snapback]
AVB said:It reminded me of Nicaraguan tobacco but I could be totally out in left field on that.
[snapback]217630[/snapback]
Lumberg said:So far as I can tell LC-smoker thought these were young, and AVB thought they were Nicaraguan (both dead wrong!)
[snapback]227623[/snapback]
AVB said:Well....... not quite, what I said was:
AVB said:It reminded me of Nicaraguan tobacco but I could be totally out in left field on that.
[snapback]217630[/snapback]
Lumberg said:So far as I can tell LC-smoker thought these were young, and AVB thought they were Nicaraguan (both dead wrong!)
[snapback]227623[/snapback][snapback]227640[/snapback]
Lumberg said:AVB said:Well....... not quite, what I said was:
AVB said:It reminded me of Nicaraguan tobacco but I could be totally out in left field on that.
[snapback]217630[/snapback]
Lumberg said:So far as I can tell LC-smoker thought these were young, and AVB thought they were Nicaraguan (both dead wrong!)
[snapback]227623[/snapback][snapback]227640[/snapback]
True, I didn't do you justice.
[snapback]227649[/snapback]