preembargo
Sleeping not so peacefully
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,686
________________________________________
Honorable Court of Public Opinion
Common Reasoning Presiding
________________________________________
Closing arguments in the case of
The Well Meaning Public vs. The Well Meaning Vitasea
The facts and evidence presented by The Well Meaning Public are as such:
1. The cigar reviewed by Moki was constructed using a combination of long and short fillers.
2. The length and band size of the cigar reviewed by Moki was inconsistent with its vitola.
3. Vitasea has made available to the cigar smoking public, Limited Edition cigars that have never been produced, specifically Cohiba Pyramide LE 2005, Cohiba Sublime EL 2005, and Partagas Serie P #2 LE 2005.
4. By Vitasea’s admission, these cigars were obtained by circumventing legitimate sources making these cigars counterfeit by definition.
The facts and evidence presented by The Well Meaning Vitasea are as such:
1. By Vitasea’s admission, these cigars were obtained by circumventing legitimate sources making these cigars counterfeit by definition.
2. The Limited Edition cigars that have never been produced, specifically Cohiba Pyramide LE 2005, Cohiba Sublime EL 2005, and Partagas Serie P #2 LE 2005 may have been a marketing test or promotion of some kind.
________________________________________
Doug,
You sent cigars to Moki and certain others because you felt that their favorable reviews would bode well towards your reputation. This might be a good move for a resaler who trusts their source. Another good move would be to accept those unfavorable reviews along with the favorable and to heed the advice of those who mean only to help you while protecting those members of this board who have little or no experience in this area (myself included).
You asked “What evidence”? It can’t be spelled out more clearly. However, as it’s been pointed out to me, this is all backwards. We shouldn't have to prove that your cigars are counterfeit.
As I’ve said, the authenticity of your cigars is secondary to the authenticity of your character. Let me echo Mr. Jingles, I hope your character is such that you can accept the facts and become a member of this community. It’s all up to you. If you decide not to, then thank you for the cigars and I pray for your success and safety in your efforts to help the Cuban people.
________________________________________
Honorable Court of Public Opinion
Common Reasoning Presiding
________________________________________
Closing arguments in the case of
The Well Meaning Public vs. The Well Meaning Vitasea
The facts and evidence presented by The Well Meaning Public are as such:
1. The cigar reviewed by Moki was constructed using a combination of long and short fillers.
2. The length and band size of the cigar reviewed by Moki was inconsistent with its vitola.
3. Vitasea has made available to the cigar smoking public, Limited Edition cigars that have never been produced, specifically Cohiba Pyramide LE 2005, Cohiba Sublime EL 2005, and Partagas Serie P #2 LE 2005.
4. By Vitasea’s admission, these cigars were obtained by circumventing legitimate sources making these cigars counterfeit by definition.
The facts and evidence presented by The Well Meaning Vitasea are as such:
1. By Vitasea’s admission, these cigars were obtained by circumventing legitimate sources making these cigars counterfeit by definition.
2. The Limited Edition cigars that have never been produced, specifically Cohiba Pyramide LE 2005, Cohiba Sublime EL 2005, and Partagas Serie P #2 LE 2005 may have been a marketing test or promotion of some kind.
________________________________________
Doug,
You sent cigars to Moki and certain others because you felt that their favorable reviews would bode well towards your reputation. This might be a good move for a resaler who trusts their source. Another good move would be to accept those unfavorable reviews along with the favorable and to heed the advice of those who mean only to help you while protecting those members of this board who have little or no experience in this area (myself included).
You asked “What evidence”? It can’t be spelled out more clearly. However, as it’s been pointed out to me, this is all backwards. We shouldn't have to prove that your cigars are counterfeit.
As I’ve said, the authenticity of your cigars is secondary to the authenticity of your character. Let me echo Mr. Jingles, I hope your character is such that you can accept the facts and become a member of this community. It’s all up to you. If you decide not to, then thank you for the cigars and I pray for your success and safety in your efforts to help the Cuban people.
________________________________________