puffnstuff
altruistic pervert
- Joined
- May 23, 2004
- Messages
- 659
hmmm...interesting.emodx said:Where I was going with this is this: There has always been a problem with unscrupulous retailers. And certain individuals hear have eitehr sold or tried to seel cigars that are not what they clim to bo. He happened to post a thread about Cigars he felt were counterfeit. I made a comment off his post about unscrupulous people and the fact that I am pretty open about revealing about someting I felt that was not right.
but isn't it common knowledge here that there's a problem with scrupulous retailers? I mean, does that require repeating here, in this thread, now? it just seems unnecessary, and, dare I say, slightly off-topic.
isn't it also well known here that "certain people" have tried to sell, or have sold, cigars that aren't what they were claimed to be?
I really am trying to grasp how any of this is/was necessary at *this* point, in *this* thread.
(granted, maybe that's what you meant by "hijacking" the thread)
(by the way, is it proper etiquette *not* to refer to people who have sold or traded counterfeits here by name? just so I'll know.)
to correct, or at least clarify, your comment (at the risk of monotony on my part)-
"He happened to post a thread about Cigars he felt were counterfeit."
no, I asked a favor of the more-experienced here to help me determine whether or not they're fake...not to imply that I think there's much of a chance otherwise. I don't think anybody here (myself included) is waiting on pins and needles to find out whether or not they're authentic. if we've learned anything from the past on this matter, chances of a verdict other than "fake" are all but zilch.
but as I clearly stated before, if they're counterfeit, the counterfeiters did a good enough job to make me feel justified in asking for help from the more experienced.
really, that's all.
and I will post the (probably anti-climactic) verdict once the jury is in.
emmett.