Generally, cigars improve with age. I have smoked pre Castro Cubans that have been absolutely sublime. The same cannot always be said for the 1964. Many of these cigars are losing their flavor. I am happy to say that I have only found this to be true once, but after speaking to a member of the Padron family I am sad to say it is a reality. For some reason these cigars hit their peak around 10 years or so and then begin to decline. Padron has a stockpile of vintage 1964's that they cannot sell because they have lost their flavor. So, as they say, smoke em if you got em.
I have to strongly disagree. I've had a number of early and mid 1990's Padróns, and I did not find that they were "losing their flavor" any more or any less than any other marca.
I'm aging the Millenniums that I'm sitting on until 2010 for a reason... I expect them to be fantastic to my tastes by then.
Who @ Padrón told you that they have a stockpile of 1964s that they can't sell? This doesn't make much sense to me, as these cigars have always been in high demand since their introduction. It seems rather unlikely to me that they are sitting on stockpiles of a cigar line that retailers grovel to obtain... at what point would they ever have had a surplus?
PADRON ANNIVERSARY 1964 CIRCA 1995 - MADURO
PYRAMID
This cigar is actually from 1999 or later, not 1995. Take a look at the printing on the band... they switched it from "Anniversario" to "Anniversary" in 1999.
PADRON ANNIVERSARY 1964 CIRCA 1999 - MADURO
TORPEDO
This cigar is actually from 2001 or later, not 1999. The second band in evidence on this cigar wasn't used until February 2001.
First let me start off by saying I'm flattered someone would take the time to research the information I posted on this site. Its nice to know that the CP community is not only interested in cigar reviews, but reviews that are factual. In a previous reply a member challenged some of the facts that were reported in the review I posted. To that, here is my reply:
Before reading further I would like to inform you that all the information that was gathered for my original post was from a member of the Padron family who got his information directly from Jorge Padron.
In regards to Padron 1964's losing flavor, this is a fact. It is unfortunate, but a fact nonetheless. The reason has not been determined, but it has plagued some of the vintage 1964's. Most manufacturers will keep some of a particular production in house, unreleased. This isn't kept because of a surplus, it is kept for a variety of other reasons such as quality control, special events, etc. The demand for a particular cigar has nothing to do with keeping stock in house.
According to the information posted on vitolas.net, They added José Padrón's signature to the back of the band in 1999, and were printing both "Anniversary" and "Anniversario" bands overlapping this time period. If there is no signature on the back, it is either pre-1999, or it is fake. As I wrote in my review, I kept the band from the cigar I smoked that night. As you can see in the pics below, there is no signature on the back of the band. This would mean that the cigar I smoked was pre 1999. Also, the site never states the switch occurred in 1999. All it states is Padron was printing both bands at that time.
In regards to the last cigar in my review, the cigar in question was indeed from 2001. It turns out I marked the box incorrectly.
Lastly, Id like to elaborate on the issue of why Padron no longer uses the name Aniversario. The reason the cigar had a name change was due to Davidoff's legal right to use the name. After contacting Padron, the lawsuit was dropped and Padron agreed to change the name of their cigar.
I hope this post has cleared up any discrepancies. Thanks again to the CP community.