bfreebern said:Ian is the man for sure!
[snapback]208828[/snapback]
Chicago_Smoker said:I like a jsp approach but the php they did is more adequate.
[snapback]208832[/snapback]
mrjinglesusa said:Chicago_Smoker said:I like a jsp approach but the php they did is more adequate.
[snapback]208832[/snapback]
NERD!!!!!
[snapback]208833[/snapback]
coventrycat86 said:KevinWHoecker said:I admitted I was wrong in calling the 1926 an Anniversary (at least I meant to) and then also brought up the fact that thousands of others were making the same mistake. That then sent you into a whirlwind of long posts. By the way, what is your view on the Padron 1926 anyway? If you are ever in Chicago let me know, we can smoke one together, on me. Should be interesting conversation!
Your posting status is very impressive. I obviously just started and am not used to the caustic nature of the forum. I am catching on quickly however and really like reading everyones views on cigars.
And, thanks for asking, business is never good enough. That is why I love to make deals.
[snapback]208351[/snapback]
Now please forgive me for being a smart ass but I'm going to call into question your reading comprehension skills. You asked me:
Go back and read my FIRST post in the thread and tell me if you saw this:By the way, what is your view on the Padron 1926 anyway?
Or did you NOT see that since you couldn't get past your rage towards me when I merely pointed out the fact that you called the cigar by the wrong name?I prefer the Padron 1926 line over the 64s but there are many a Padron whore out there who see it the other way around (like RicMac25 ).
Now call that "caustic" or whatever you want but when ya post dumb things, chances are yer gonna get yer balz busted. and 99% of the time it's not as "caustic" as you have concluded that it is. So you better grow a thicker layer of skin over that extremely thin one that ya got?
"Get it"?
Oh and on a side note when you grossly exaggerate like this:
It removes almost all credibility from any argument thay you may be trying to make. unless of course a "whirlwind" in your book is two or three.That then sent you into a whirlwind of long posts.
[snapback]208365[/snapback]
Mephiston said:Just a few things KevinW. First You are talking to mostly a bunch of cigar guru's that have experiance from about one month to a good many years.We always take cigars seriously and we always take sales of cigars (especially at our own sight) very seriously.My botl's can spot a fake ISOM dealer or scam artist before there first post ever hits the boards (not that you are). If you want sales and want us to buy stop worrying so much about what we think of you. sell some cigars look at the competition and give us a better or equal price.Give us well packaged product that is delivered timely and not dry or damaged. And if there is a problem take care of the customer.Run some specials to start with and go from there.Most of all if you have questions ask. We can always help or find an answer.I know you sell cigars but its near impossible to know everything.Be real and be a member of the sight not a salesman.And for crying out loud post in the right places.Just my 2 cents. Good luck.
[snapback]208989[/snapback]
KevinWHoecker said:Very good point Stray, as I can see how it can be misconstrued to look as though we are claiming copyright to everything on that page. The Copyright text is actually a link that we have on every page that brings you to the terms and conditions of our site. It wasn't meant to function as you are saying. Within the text of the terms and conditions, we say that "Unless otherwise noted, all materials, including images, illustrations, designs, icons, photographs, and other written materials that are part of the Site are copyrights, trademarks, trade dress and/or other intellectual properties owned, controlled or licensed by TheCigarHumidor.com." We should really get rid of the "text" portion of that. Interesting point. That also holds true for the brand descriptions the manufacturers wrote those.
Sorry to all others who read this post and are bored to death by it.
[snapback]209962[/snapback]
KevinWHoecker said:Very good point Stray, as I can see how it can be misconstrued to look as though we are claiming copyright to everything on that page. The Copyright text is actually a link that we have on every page that brings you to the terms and conditions of our site. It wasn't meant to function as you are saying. Within the text of the terms and conditions, we say that "Unless otherwise noted, all materials, including images, illustrations, designs, icons, photographs, and other written materials that are part of the Site are copyrights, trademarks, trade dress and/or other intellectual properties owned, controlled or licensed by TheCigarHumidor.com." We should really get rid of the "text" portion of that. Interesting point. That also holds true for the brand descriptions the manufacturers wrote those.
Sorry to all others who read this post and are bored to death by it.
[snapback]209962[/snapback]
moki said:KevinWHoecker said:Very good point Stray, as I can see how it can be misconstrued to look as though we are claiming copyright to everything on that page. The Copyright text is actually a link that we have on every page that brings you to the terms and conditions of our site. It wasn't meant to function as you are saying. Within the text of the terms and conditions, we say that "Unless otherwise noted, all materials, including images, illustrations, designs, icons, photographs, and other written materials that are part of the Site are copyrights, trademarks, trade dress and/or other intellectual properties owned, controlled or licensed by TheCigarHumidor.com." We should really get rid of the "text" portion of that. Interesting point. That also holds true for the brand descriptions the manufacturers wrote those.
Sorry to all others who read this post and are bored to death by it.
[snapback]209962[/snapback]
Actually, what you're doing is using their copyrighted text without permission; please see here:
http://www.cigargroup.com/faq/
Revision 3.05 - 6/08/05
compiled by Bob Curtis, Internet Cigar Group
(all rights reserved)
...and then scroll down to the bottom of the page:
Copyright 1995, 1996 by Bob Curtis (bc@cigargroup.com), and
the Internet Cigar Group.
All rights reserved.
I'm thinking you need to mail Bob, apologize for using the text without permission, and then seek permission to use said text. What you've done is a violation of copyright law.
[snapback]210116[/snapback]
Uhhhhhh, the word "Anniversary" is NOT used with respect to a Padron 1926 at all. The Padron Anniversary 1964 Naturals which are sometimes called "PAN" and the Padron Anniversary 1964 Maduros, which are sometimes called "PAM" use "anniversary" in their name. The Padron 1926 does not.
I prefer the Padron 1926 line over the 64s but there are many a Padron whore out there who see it the other way around (like RicMac25).
This thread is 6 years old....not sure what the need to bump it was....