CMontoya79
Newb Le professional!
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,097
:thumbs:
Now I'm KNOW I'm too old when that thought never occurred to me.golfgar said:................, taking a whiff in the hole and rubbing my hand down the neck and saying..................................
Hmmm, let me cogitate on that for a minute. :laugh:
BigJake6904 said:I'd take an Acid over a Gurkha. Thanks for introducing yourself.
Do people actually believe the things they type?? Just because someone pays stupid amounts of money for something doesn't make the product good. I won't smoke another Gurkha, they are just to flakley for me.daviddadson said:The Gurkha line itself has been known to many as the ‘Rolls Royce’ of cigars and is enjoyed by many of the world’s elite including but not limited to; members of the Royal Family, Military leaders, leading government officials and celebrites, making some of the Gurkha cigars one of the most expensive on the planet.
oke&coke said:
I would say less like Rolls Royce and more like Ford Pinto. Sure it may get you there, but do you really want to take the chance.
jsm11 said:Got to wonder if this is MikesCigars spam or Gurkha Spam...
Either way, not clicking the link and not smoking Gurkha's... Well, at least paying for them. I had a BOTL gift me one and it smoked well enough. Nothing worth repurchasing though...
brownpeter335 said:May be it's an expensive cigar, to me it's an outstanding cigar too.
zeemanb said:I don't think I've ever smoked a Gurkha, but my my main observation is this: They make cigars that you can buy on Cbid for fifty bucks for an entire box any day of the week, and they make $2000 cigars. As far as I know there's no in-between, no Hemingway midpoint between their Curly Head Deluxe and their Opus X. So chances are good that either the Cbid dog rockets are one of the most unsung bargains in the history of cigars, or their $2000 cigars are one of the biggest burns in the history of cigars. I'm not taking the chance on either end of that spectrum.
Thanks for this, I laughed for a full 2 minutes.golfgar said:I would say less like Rolls Royce and more like Ford Pinto. Sure it may get you there, but do you really want to take the chance.
"1 – Ford Pinto 1971-1980
The Pinto had a very dangerous design flaw, which made the car prone to explode during rear-end collisions. The Pinto didn’t have a proper rear bumper and there were also no reinforcement’s around the gas tank so it was vulnerable to puncture which caused explosion on impact. The doors were also poorly designed and were susceptible to jamming after accidents. Many lawsuits were filed because of the safety issues of the Pinto, and then Ford came under heavy fire when a company memo showed that Ford decided it would be cheaper to pay off all of the lawsuits from Pinto related deaths than to pay for a vehicle redesign."
Remarkably similar prose in the post here and the article about the new cigar.