I'm actually in Hawaii, now, but that's neither here nor there. I'm asking for my own viewpoint -- it really has little to do with any public perceptions or anything like that. Honestly, when I was in Europe, I was very insulated (or isolated, I guess) from popular social outlooks. I didn't have TV and I only found out local feelings and news when I actively sought it out. I like life better that way!
I'm a vet/medical retiree, myself, so I definitely understand the pro-duty thing.
My sister texted me the other day emphatically imploring me to go see American Sniper. I asked her if she read the book, and of course she hadn't. She takes things at dramatic face value, and didn't really understand any of my questions and concerns about the story. As a screenplay and cinematic artwork, I'm sure it is a great film. I take nothing away from the subject of Chris Kyle's accomplishments: he killed a lot of people who needed the killin', and he saved a lot of coalition lives, no doubt. Post-service, he apparently did a lot of good for veterans. For some reason she has a problem with Luttrell and Lone Survivor. She says he "lied" and the movie wasn't true. Wellll... first, it's Hollywood. Of course there's a lot of dramatization. American Sniper has a bunch of inaccuracies, as well. That's why I don't put too much stock in movies. Second, Chris Kyle has been accused as being slightly less than the bastion of truth, himself. It's literature and film written and produced to make money. Simple as that. As for my own questions, Kyle (and/or his co-writers) presents himself in a certain light. It's hard to explain, but seeing an action on a screen, even if it is the same as an action depicted in the book, often doesn't convey the same "internal description" as what you read. We see
what someone did, but there's not a true representation of
why it was done, if that makes sense. That can make a big difference in how you actually see the story.