How moist was the tobacco? If you pressed a bunch together did it stay in the clump when you released the pressure? The clump should come apart on its own.
Aromatics, by their nature, will be higher in moisture than non-aromatics because of the flavoring and because of
the PG added to maintain that moisture.
The sequence in lighting is: move the flame over the surface of the tobacco while taking small rapid puffs. The tobacco will ignite and rise above the bowl. Tamp it back to level (gently) and relight while taking longer, deeper puffs, again moving the flame over the surface of the tobacco.
Relighting is common, even for experienced smokers. Being able to get only 2 puffs tells me that either the charring light (the first one) was insufficient, or the second one was. That, or the tobacco is so moist that it's
reluctant to burn.
As far as that $29 tobacco is concerned, that would be a reasonable price online for a POUND of high-grade tobacco, and even that would be high. What was he pricing at that level? :whistling: :0
Aromatics, by their nature, will be higher in moisture than non-aromatics because of the flavoring and because of
the PG added to maintain that moisture.
The sequence in lighting is: move the flame over the surface of the tobacco while taking small rapid puffs. The tobacco will ignite and rise above the bowl. Tamp it back to level (gently) and relight while taking longer, deeper puffs, again moving the flame over the surface of the tobacco.
Relighting is common, even for experienced smokers. Being able to get only 2 puffs tells me that either the charring light (the first one) was insufficient, or the second one was. That, or the tobacco is so moist that it's
reluctant to burn.
As far as that $29 tobacco is concerned, that would be a reasonable price online for a POUND of high-grade tobacco, and even that would be high. What was he pricing at that level? :whistling: :0