wkoti
Flaky McFlakerton
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,138
So I'm getting ready to sell off my old gaming desktop and looking to build another. I happen to find some amazing deals at the local stores for various equipment, but I guess my biggest quandary is the processor.
I've always been more of Intel guy since I started building computers when I was a kid, Celerons, Pentium Dual Cores, Intel Core 2 Duos, Intel Core 2 Quad. Now that the "i" series has made some improvements and fixed some stability issues, I was thinking about going with a "i"series, but between price and all the freaking different versions and options, I'm almost detoured. But then there is AMD, which I know just a little about. They are a whole hell of a lot cheaper, granted most can't stand toe to toe with the new Intel. I know they just released the FX 8120-8150 (Bulldozer) 8 core processors, but there is still much debate between 8 cores making a difference with PC gaming compared to 6 or even 4 cores.
From what I've been able to figure out (Could be totally wrong) is that even the new FX 8120-8150 barely surpass the older Phenom II X6 1100T, which barely beats the even older Phenom II X4 980. And from what I hear, the Phenom II X4 980, even though it's out dated and older, is still a solid processor for gaming. It's no Intel i7 3960x, but at over $800 cheaper, I don't expect it to be.
And on the other hand, I have a problem with Intels versions of the same processor, "k" being fully unlocked and the regular being partially unlocked. And the Xeons appear to be completely useless when it comes to gaming performance, not to mention some having a $4000 price tag. The motherboards are also spendy and not easily accessible, being the new LGA1155 compared to AMD sticking with the same AM3+ socket.
I found a super cheap Radeon HD 6870 that I sprung on for the new build and 16 Gigs of DDR3.
I know we have a bunch of PC gamers here, what's your input? What are your experiences? What are your thoughts?
I've always been more of Intel guy since I started building computers when I was a kid, Celerons, Pentium Dual Cores, Intel Core 2 Duos, Intel Core 2 Quad. Now that the "i" series has made some improvements and fixed some stability issues, I was thinking about going with a "i"series, but between price and all the freaking different versions and options, I'm almost detoured. But then there is AMD, which I know just a little about. They are a whole hell of a lot cheaper, granted most can't stand toe to toe with the new Intel. I know they just released the FX 8120-8150 (Bulldozer) 8 core processors, but there is still much debate between 8 cores making a difference with PC gaming compared to 6 or even 4 cores.
From what I've been able to figure out (Could be totally wrong) is that even the new FX 8120-8150 barely surpass the older Phenom II X6 1100T, which barely beats the even older Phenom II X4 980. And from what I hear, the Phenom II X4 980, even though it's out dated and older, is still a solid processor for gaming. It's no Intel i7 3960x, but at over $800 cheaper, I don't expect it to be.
And on the other hand, I have a problem with Intels versions of the same processor, "k" being fully unlocked and the regular being partially unlocked. And the Xeons appear to be completely useless when it comes to gaming performance, not to mention some having a $4000 price tag. The motherboards are also spendy and not easily accessible, being the new LGA1155 compared to AMD sticking with the same AM3+ socket.
I found a super cheap Radeon HD 6870 that I sprung on for the new build and 16 Gigs of DDR3.
I know we have a bunch of PC gamers here, what's your input? What are your experiences? What are your thoughts?