Aurturo Fuente Anejo Reserva Shark No. 77

[jfields]

Arturo Fuente Anejo cigars are made with the same filler and binder as the Opus-X cigars are.

Not exactly... nice review though, very well done.

I stand corrected. Thanks for the information and the interesting story on how the Shark got it's name and number designation.

Looks like I need to pay attention to where I gather my information from now on.


TYFNS............You were right, I was wrong. :blush:

 

[Infinity]

Great review and pics as usual John. It's a well constructed stick, a wonderful smoke, your taste description is good.

I love all the Anejo' vitola's with the Shark being my favorite. I think the original ash stand started with the Shark.

Brian

 

[moki]

Great review and pics as usual John. It's a well constructed stick, a wonderful smoke, your taste description is good.

I love all the Anejo' vitola's with the Shark being my favorite. I think the original ash stand started with the Shark.

Brian

Now what kind of psycho would have started that?

 

[Infinity]

Great review and pics as usual John. It's a well constructed stick, a wonderful smoke, your taste description is good.

I love all the Anejo' vitola's with the Shark being my favorite. I think the original ash stand started with the Shark.

Brian

Now what kind of psycho would have started that?

Self praise is no recommendation! :laugh:

Brian

 

[JHolmes763]

His link didn't work because he copied the URL from the web browser's address bar. You have to scroll down, and copy the link next to URL: at the bottom of the vitolas.net page in question. Just how the software works.

Is that a feature of the Coppermine image gallery program or an add-on to Coppermine? Just seems counter-intuitive to not use the URL in the address bar, you know. Maybe some fancy rewrite rules or URL redirection could fix that?

 

[Mark Twain]

It's always nice to see someone enjoy a cigar that's new to them. Great review. I love these things when I can find them.

Nice review Marc. Awesome pictures you took as well. Nice legs. :laugh:

Them are some hairy legs John. It's almost like. . .naw this couldn't be you. :laugh:

 

[Aventinus]

Nice review. I smoked a #46 a couple of weeks ago, and it held an ash for at least three inches.
I loved the flavor, but it packed a kick in the nicotine department.

 

[moki]

His link didn't work because he copied the URL from the web browser's address bar. You have to scroll down, and copy the link next to URL: at the bottom of the vitolas.net page in question. Just how the software works.

Is that a feature of the Coppermine image gallery program or an add-on to Coppermine? Just seems counter-intuitive to not use the URL in the address bar, you know. Maybe some fancy rewrite rules or URL redirection could fix that?

It's just the way Coppermine is. They have it logged as a feature request to change it for a future version.

The reason it works that way actually makes sense if you use Coppermine much -- it can view albums in many different ways, such as by date added, number of hits, etc. So in order for the Next/Previous and other functions to work, it has to have URLs that are different depending on how the user came to view that image.

 

[jfields]

It's always nice to see someone enjoy a cigar that's new to them. Great review. I love these things when I can find them.

Nice review Marc. Awesome pictures you took as well. Nice legs. :laugh:

Them are some hairy legs John. It's almost like. . .naw this couldn't be you. :laugh:

Looks like Marc is like the elephant that never forgets, and I need to watch what I say. :laugh:

Thanks everyone for the positive feedback. This is the first cigar that I distinctly remember being able to pick out flavors other than the usual coffee, leather, etc.

 

[theorangeman]

Great review and it looks like you definitely enjoyed the smoke - your pics were great. :laugh: