I thought you may have know something I didn't when you posted that link. If you do I haven't had time to comb through 14 pages to try to figure it out.I don't have any experience with R&J Churchills as to what band was on them and when, but the bands on yours looks like the bands on my Tubo #3's. It's embossed and the color and spacing looks good. Your cigars appear to have a fine toothy fuzz on the wrapper that is characteristic of the Cuban R&J. I say real. Smoke one and let us know.
Edited to correct typos.
Search Evil Dr. Moki!
I thought you may have know something I didn't when you posted that link. If you do I haven't had time to comb through 14 pages to try to figure it out.I don't have any experience with R&J Churchills as to what band was on them and when, but the bands on yours looks like the bands on my Tubo #3's. It's embossed and the color and spacing looks good. Your cigars appear to have a fine toothy fuzz on the wrapper that is characteristic of the Cuban R&J. I say real. Smoke one and let us know.
Edited to correct typos.
Search Evil Dr. Moki!
Locke - you may want to edit your last post - we don't openly link or discuss sources here - but if we did I'd say their prices are high.
Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a look over.
I thought you may have know something I didn't when you posted that link. If you do I haven't had time to comb through 14 pages to try to figure it out.I don't have any experience with R&J Churchills as to what band was on them and when, but the bands on yours looks like the bands on my Tubo #3's. It's embossed and the color and spacing looks good. Your cigars appear to have a fine toothy fuzz on the wrapper that is characteristic of the Cuban R&J. I say real. Smoke one and let us know.
Edited to correct typos.
Search Evil Dr. Moki!
Locke - you may want to edit your last post - we don't openly link or discuss sources here - but if we did I'd say their prices are high.