Kid Montana
Well-Known Member
Though not a seasoned cigar pro by any means, I've had enough smokes to know what I like, what makes for a good tasting cigar in general, and when a cigar really lacks an essential quality. When I first began smoking, however, I held a lot of mistaken perceptions.
Several of the first cigars I ever smoked were fairly dried out, uncared for, and cheap. In particular there were a couple pyramides of an un-remembered brand that were very acrid, very spicy/peppery and bitter. Because of this, I thought this was a characteristic of the pyramide vitola, having not realized the differences in manufacture, tobacco quality, humidification etc etc. Regardless, since then I've had a distinct unconscious preference for parejos vs. figurados.
Anybody else recall a completely bizarre perception or misconception you may have once held about cigars?
Several of the first cigars I ever smoked were fairly dried out, uncared for, and cheap. In particular there were a couple pyramides of an un-remembered brand that were very acrid, very spicy/peppery and bitter. Because of this, I thought this was a characteristic of the pyramide vitola, having not realized the differences in manufacture, tobacco quality, humidification etc etc. Regardless, since then I've had a distinct unconscious preference for parejos vs. figurados.
Anybody else recall a completely bizarre perception or misconception you may have once held about cigars?