• Hi Guest - Sign up now for Secret Santa 2024!
    Click here to sign up!
  • Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

Trinidad Fundadores

Mark Twain

Call me Ishmael.
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
1,626
opus119.jpg

Size
7 5/8 x 40

This is the most impressively flavored cigar that I’ve smoked to date. I’m still fairly new to smoking, and tend to gravitate toward more robusto sized cigars and seem to avoid most vitolas with a ring gauge less than 40. I was impressed by Moki’s and Brickhouse’s review of the LFD Lancero and found some on auction and was absolutely blown away. I started searching around for thinner gauge cigars and bought a box of PAM ’64 Monarcos. These things were really tasty and I decided to turn my search south of Miami and came across these babies.

Pre-Light impression

The cigar is beautifully constructed and firm to the touch. The wrapper is nearly flawless in appearance and looks like a milk chocolate twix candy bar. It had a fairly swift trip and only rested for a day in my humidor before I decided to burn this baby. The smell was gorgeous. Dense, naked tobacco filled my nose and I was practically drooling over this baby.

Cut
I used my Xikar cutter and popped the cap off as gently as I could. This cigar was beautifully constructed, and there was no problem with loose tobacco unraveling. It drew well which was an immense relief after all the horror stories of smaller ring gauge cigars being plugged. I’m glad those days are behind us and hope to never hear of them again.
opus121.jpg


Boy do I look damn good in this picture.

opus122.jpg

The guy I split the box with, my brother Mike

Initial light
I toasted the foot for a good thirty seconds with my butane lighter before I finally began the smoke. The foot burned evenly and the entire cigar only required one touch up during the smoke. The first 20 minutes were very light and indistinct. I picked up a lot of flavors but nothing really popped out at me.

The Smoke

After the first 30 minutes the flavor profile of the cigar settled down into a consistency of light wood tones masked with leathery earthy notes. The cigar was a solid medium body smoke. The ash lasted several inches before I flicked the foot away. The smoke was very light, almost mild compared to the full-bodied cigars that have come to dominate the NC market. The flavor really was the most standout feature that the Fundadores offers. Half way through the smoke the flavor profile began a gentle change and started to reveal a rich core a vanilla that left a finish to die for. The last part of the cigar was by far the best and contained the most revealing characteristics that really exemplify Cuban cigars over their NC counterparts.
opus124.jpg

opus123.jpg

opus126.jpg

opus128.jpg

Overall
Yeah, this was pricey, by far the most I’ve spent on any cigar, but it was worth it. I really am starting to fall in love with thinner ring gauge cigars that are absolute flavor bombs. I recommend this cigar to those that are drawn to more elegant smokes. The rest of these are going into storage to see what a few months/years does to them. I gotta say that the ’06 Cubans are smoking beautifully.
 
I've really gotten into thinner cigar as well. Although I gravitate toward whatever size tastes best for that line. The Fundadore is that cigar. Such a good, flavorful cigar when not plugged (had 3 that were un-smokable)! Glad you enjoyed it...nice review.

-Fetter
 
Marc,
Great review bro... wish I had ANY ability to be decriptive, OR write!!! :blush:
Sounds like a amzing smoke, I'll have to add it to the wish list!!!

Thanks again bro!
 
Great review! Definitely sounds like a choice smoke
 
Nice review. Liked the pics. I might just have to get myself some of those babies.
 
Nice review. Liked the pics. I might just have to get myself some of those babies.
The pics or the cigars? :laugh:

Very nice review, thanks. Use your macro function for those close up pics.

Brian
 
Your best review to date by far IMHO. Very descriptive and great pics. I really enjoyed reading it. Thanks :thumbs:
 
Initial light
...The foot burned evenly and the entire cigar only required one touch up during the smoke. The first 20 minutes were very light and indistinct. I picked up a lot of flavors but nothing really popped out at me.

The Smoke

After the first 30 minutes the flavor profile of the cigar settled down into a consistency of light wood tones masked with leathery earthy notes. The cigar was a solid medium body smoke. The ash lasted several inches before I flicked the foot away. The smoke was very light, almost mild compared to the full-bodied cigars that have come to dominate the NC market. The flavor really was the most standout feature that the Fundadores offers. Half way through the smoke the flavor profile began a gentle change and started to reveal a rich core a vanilla that left a finish to die for.

I gotta say that the ’06 Cubans are smoking beautifully.

Very nice review, Marc! :thumbs: your experience is very similar to mine with this vitola. I find the Fundadores much more subtle than the other thin ring vitolas such as the Reyes and Coloniales.

Amen to your last statement. So many of the 06 are just unbelievably good.

Keep these fantastic reviews coming!

Wilkey

BTW, we need to get you in the Blind Review PIF. :)
 
Very nice review, Marc! thumbs-up.gif your experience is very similar to mine with this vitola. I find the Fundadores much more subtle than the other thin ring vitolas such as the Reyes and Coloniales.

Amen to your last statement. So many of the 06 are just unbelievably good.

Keep these fantastic reviews coming!

Wilkey

BTW, we need to get you in the Blind Review PIF. smile.gif

Thanks Wilkey

I’ve had a lot on my mind these past few weeks. Preparing a 30-40 page writing sample, studying for the GRE in early November, getting all my work down at University in preparation for graduation come December. This was the first review in awhile that I sat down to write just for the joy of it and there will be more. :D

I’d love to get into the Blind review, let me just say gimme right now to Cuppajack :cool:
:p
 
Very nicely done. :)

Fundadores are among the best, there's non doubt.

While I enjoy a Prominente a few times a year, and a robusto a little more often than that, I've come to favor 46 ring and thinner cigars. It's kinda been a shame to me to see Altadis moving toward thicker smokes like the Siglo VI and Edmundo while eliminating some of the classic thinner lines.
 
I've come to favor 46 ring and thinner cigars. It's kinda been a shame to me to see Altadis moving toward thicker smokes like the Siglo VI and Edmundo while eliminating some of the classic thinner lines.

Amen to that! What happened to the calssic ISOM sizes? What is the preoccupation as of late with larger cigars? Wilkey? I KNOW you must have some vast, insightful thoughts on the matter. Is it the influence of the American market, where a bigger cigar is almost always the go to?
I was at an outdoor smoking event not terribly long ago, and a gentleman (stretching to use the word here) actually SAID SOMETHING about me smoking a "ladies cigar" not a "real cigar." It was a 98 (99? 2000? Gary--you remember what those old ones were?) Madaille d'or.
Sorry for the threadjack...I think I'll start a new thread ON topic.


PS---Great review of one of my favorite cigars!
 
I've come to favor 46 ring and thinner cigars. It's kinda been a shame to me to see Altadis moving toward thicker smokes like the Siglo VI and Edmundo while eliminating some of the classic thinner lines.

Amen to that! What happened to the calssic ISOM sizes? What is the preoccupation as of late with larger cigars? Wilkey? I KNOW you must have some vast, insightful thoughts on the matter. Is it the influence of the American market, where a bigger cigar is almost always the go to?
I was at an outdoor smoking event not terribly long ago, and a gentleman (stretching to use the word here) actually SAID SOMETHING about me smoking a "ladies cigar" not a "real cigar." It was a 98 (99? 2000? Gary--you remember what those old ones were?) Madaille d'or.
Sorry for the threadjack...I think I'll start a new thread ON topic.


PS---Great review of one of my favorite cigars!



2000
 
Awesome review :thumbs: , I'm with you, I've been stuck on the robusto or larger ring gage cigar for the past year or so and have just started to come around to the thinner ones. Lately, I've really been enjoying the longer thinner smokes. It all started with that damn Lancero :laugh:
 
I've come to favor 46 ring and thinner cigars. It's kinda been a shame to me to see Altadis moving toward thicker smokes like the Siglo VI and Edmundo while eliminating some of the classic thinner lines.

Amen to that! What happened to the calssic ISOM sizes? What is the preoccupation as of late with larger cigars? Wilkey? I KNOW you must have some vast, insightful thoughts on the matter. Is it the influence of the American market, where a bigger cigar is almost always the go to?
I was at an outdoor smoking event not terribly long ago, and a gentleman (stretching to use the word here) actually SAID SOMETHING about me smoking a "ladies cigar" not a "real cigar." It was a 98 (99? 2000? Gary--you remember what those old ones were?) Madaille d'or.
Sorry for the threadjack...I think I'll start a new thread ON topic.


PS---Great review of one of my favorite cigars!

double AMEN!!

I absolutely love the 38-40 ring gauge, I wish Habanos would come out with more cigars in this ring. I think there is a big misconception that you need 6 or 7 different leaves to make a flavourful smoke.

Also, great review and great pics.
 
Nice review and pictures. You look like you're having an orgasm while smoking, while your brother has the exact same expression in both of his pics that gives away nothing. :p
 
Nice review and pictures. You look like you're having an orgasm while smoking, while your brother has the exact same expression in both of his pics that gives away nothing. :p



I don't want to know - how you know - what he looks like - while having an orgasm!



FOUL Called on Zeebra!!!!!!!!



SCP007.jpg
 
Nice review and pictures. You look like you're having an orgasm while smoking, while your brother has the exact same expression in both of his pics that gives away nothing.

:0
:blush:
:p
 
A very nice review of a really great smoke. I did not think that you, or your brother were having an orgasm. I thought that you both looked stoned and were enjoying those smokes to thier fullest. Thanks for the review and the pics. Pics always make a thread more interesting!

Again, nice job! :thumbs:
 
Top