JHolmes763
Drinkin' the koolaid
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,739
I know there's been a couple reviews of this already, but I figured I'd throw my own into the hat (along with some pics) since I smoked one of these a couple of nights ago.
Construction was great. A nice dark wrapper with a bit of a box press shape to it. This particular cigar had a split at the foot for about 1/2 inch because it was dropped a while ago. I've had this cigar since around Christmas time.
I cut this without issues - nice and clean cut. Pre-light draw was a little tighter than I liked, but not unbearable. Lighting was easy and the cigar started burning without any issues.
The taste... I get a really earth, woody flavor from these cigars initially, but as always with these 92s, I get flavors of a brassy metallic. It's not consistent and kind of comes and goes, but when it's there, it's unpleasant and overpowers the better flavors. The overall burn was a little uneven, but nothing worth touching up. The cigar started to get bitter at the last two inches, so I dropped it shortly after the last picture.
The tastes and experience I get with these 92s is always the same, even in the seconds I'd sometimes get from CI. There's always a brassy, metallic taste to me that makes them unpleasant. Without that, these would be great cigars, but there's just something in these that doesn't agree with me.
Let me say that I love the 90s. I get a completely different flavor profile with those. For me to read that the 90s and 92s have same filler and binder with just a different wrapper floors me. I don't see how it can be.
I give this cigar a 6.5 out of 10.
---John Holmes...
Construction was great. A nice dark wrapper with a bit of a box press shape to it. This particular cigar had a split at the foot for about 1/2 inch because it was dropped a while ago. I've had this cigar since around Christmas time.
I cut this without issues - nice and clean cut. Pre-light draw was a little tighter than I liked, but not unbearable. Lighting was easy and the cigar started burning without any issues.
The taste... I get a really earth, woody flavor from these cigars initially, but as always with these 92s, I get flavors of a brassy metallic. It's not consistent and kind of comes and goes, but when it's there, it's unpleasant and overpowers the better flavors. The overall burn was a little uneven, but nothing worth touching up. The cigar started to get bitter at the last two inches, so I dropped it shortly after the last picture.
The tastes and experience I get with these 92s is always the same, even in the seconds I'd sometimes get from CI. There's always a brassy, metallic taste to me that makes them unpleasant. Without that, these would be great cigars, but there's just something in these that doesn't agree with me.
Let me say that I love the 90s. I get a completely different flavor profile with those. For me to read that the 90s and 92s have same filler and binder with just a different wrapper floors me. I don't see how it can be.
I give this cigar a 6.5 out of 10.
---John Holmes...