After Scot cast the deciding vote, I went with the Pinar 3000 Toro.
It was a nice solid, veiny cigar with a pre-cut draw that was slightly on the open side. The first third was a bit spicey and maybe some burnt wood taste.
However, the tast mellowed quite a bit for the final two-thirds and became very smooth, sweet and maybe a bit buttery. Overall I would say it was medium to slightly full bodied
The construction was decent; the cigar required a few minor corrections. The ash was grey and solid and the stick became warm at the very end.
Overall I enjoyed this cigar and definately plan on having another.
It was a nice solid, veiny cigar with a pre-cut draw that was slightly on the open side. The first third was a bit spicey and maybe some burnt wood taste.
However, the tast mellowed quite a bit for the final two-thirds and became very smooth, sweet and maybe a bit buttery. Overall I would say it was medium to slightly full bodied
The construction was decent; the cigar required a few minor corrections. The ash was grey and solid and the stick became warm at the very end.
Overall I enjoyed this cigar and definately plan on having another.
I honestly don't see why people think these are bad cigars - every one I have had has been great. Bottom line is that if you like a cigar, it doesn't matter what anyone else has to say about it. :thumbs: 
