Well,
My wife was hanging out with her sister this evening so it afforded me a chance to try two cigars in one evening. I decided to try a PAN Exclusivo and a Padron 126 #35 maduro.
Both cigars burned perfectly, neither needing a touch-up at all. All the cigars that I have been smoking the past two months have all needed touch-ups including a PAM Exclusivo I smoked last night. I attribute this to the first 50+ F and rainy night we have had in Chicago this year.
Anyway, to make a long story short, I felt that the PAN was very bland and didn't do much for me. The #35 was awesome! Very creamy and thick chewy smoke. The 35 produced more smoke than either PAN or the previous PAM. I thoroughly enjoyed the 35 while the PAN left me disappointed. Both cigars have been sitting in my coolerdor for about a month at 65%.
I have to say that the PAM I smoked last night was very good but the 35 just was better. I think I will take the plunge and buy a box of the 1926s!
My wife was hanging out with her sister this evening so it afforded me a chance to try two cigars in one evening. I decided to try a PAN Exclusivo and a Padron 126 #35 maduro.
Both cigars burned perfectly, neither needing a touch-up at all. All the cigars that I have been smoking the past two months have all needed touch-ups including a PAM Exclusivo I smoked last night. I attribute this to the first 50+ F and rainy night we have had in Chicago this year.
Anyway, to make a long story short, I felt that the PAN was very bland and didn't do much for me. The #35 was awesome! Very creamy and thick chewy smoke. The 35 produced more smoke than either PAN or the previous PAM. I thoroughly enjoyed the 35 while the PAN left me disappointed. Both cigars have been sitting in my coolerdor for about a month at 65%.
I have to say that the PAM I smoked last night was very good but the 35 just was better. I think I will take the plunge and buy a box of the 1926s!