Tony Bones
Grundalier
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2004
- Messages
- 768
You just can't go wrong w/ this smoke.
From its solid weight in the hand to the quality of its deep brown wrapper, the larger sticks in the PAM 1964 series are just dead on target and great.
An easy and even light was followed by plumes of that white smoke I've grown to love from PAM's. The smoke was nutty in taste and sweet in smell with a smooth draw and just a bit less spice than the 1926's. Good stuff.
The stick burnt evenly throughout and held a good two inch ash before plunking down. No relighting necessary.
It's difficult to come up with anything bad about this cigar, other than maybe the price one would pay for them in Washington. I solved that problem with a good source and won't look back from here on out.
Highly reccomended.
From its solid weight in the hand to the quality of its deep brown wrapper, the larger sticks in the PAM 1964 series are just dead on target and great.
An easy and even light was followed by plumes of that white smoke I've grown to love from PAM's. The smoke was nutty in taste and sweet in smell with a smooth draw and just a bit less spice than the 1926's. Good stuff.
The stick burnt evenly throughout and held a good two inch ash before plunking down. No relighting necessary.
It's difficult to come up with anything bad about this cigar, other than maybe the price one would pay for them in Washington. I solved that problem with a good source and won't look back from here on out.
Highly reccomended.
