• Hi Guest - Sign up now for Secret Santa 2024!
    Click here to sign up!
  • Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

OR Añejo No.48 review

moki

el Presidente
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Messages
9,418
27.jpg


Last night I had the dubious pleasure of driving my girlfriend's sister to a Josh Grobin concert... thankfully, I didn't have to go inside to hear him bleating away; instead I hung outside, and decided to treat myself to an Original Release Añejo No.48.

What's an Original Release (OR) Añejo? Well, back in 1998, a hurricane savaged the Fuente farm in the Dominican Republic. Carlito Fuente was concerned that the damage to their crop and stores would result in the inability to deliver Opus X cigars in quantity. Hardest hit was the wrapper, because it's produced in such limited quantities to begin with.

So they decided to make a one-time special release cigar in late 2000, the Añejo, which would use Opus X filler and binder, but Connecticut shade maduro wrapper that had been aged in cognac barrels for 7 years. The cigars ended up being such a hit that Fuente decided to keep producing them, generally releasing them twice a year, around Father's Day and Christmas.

Original Release Añejos were different, though. Subsequent releases of the Añejos, while still absolutely wonderful cigars, had Connecticut broadleaf wrapper that was aged only for 3 years in cognac barrels, and it is also rumoured that the blend is slightly different.

The only way to tell the difference visually is that OR Añejos have no cedar on them (except for the Shark, which has no cedar for any release). So I decided to spark up an OR Añejo No.48 (Churchill size, 7" x 48) and see what all the fuss was about. I'll admit to being a bit skeptical that it'd taste much different from a regular release Añejo, but I was pleasantly surprised.

The OR Añejo does have a similar taste profile to subsequent releases, but it is more intense by an order of magnitude. The wrapper is delicious in flavor, like a fine bittersweet dark chocolate, and the cigar was just absolutely wonderful.

Despite having Opus X filler and binder, all of the Añejos bear only passing resemblance to Opus X cigars in terms of taste profile. This is a good example of how much the wrapper influences the taste of a cigar, because the overwhelming flavor is more of a deep rich chocolate, with hints of spice and muted cherry sweetness.

The hints of cognac are more intense than in regular Añejos, as well as the blend overall tasting much more robust, despite the cigar being almost 4 years old at this point. If you like Añejos, join the hunt for an Original Release... I think you'll be in for a wonderful smoking experience.
 
Thanks for the review Moki :thumbs:

Sound like one of the more interesting Anejos ;)
 
moki said:
[ If you like Añejos, join the hunt for an Original Release... I think you'll be in for a wonderful smoking experience.
hunt this...send me some now :D
 
WOW :0 That cigar is almost dripping in oil. Thanks for sharing Moki :thumbs:
 
Didn't I just read this exact same review somewhere else? Make those CW toadies come here to read your stuff :p
 
moki said:
Last night I had the dubious pleasure of driving my girlfriend's sister to a Josh Grobin concert... thankfully, I didn't have to go inside to hear him bleating away;
Whats wrong with Josh Groban? At least he has a voice compared to some of the crap singers that are out there today.

BTW Andrew, excellent review. :thumbs:
 
AVB said:
Didn't I just read this exact same review somewhere else? Make those CW toadies come here to read your stuff :p
I'm syndicated :p
 
Shadow said:
Whats wrong with Josh Groban? At least he has a voice compared to some of the crap singers that are out there today.
He's got a good voice, but something about his songs rub me the wrong way. Definitely geared towards the young chick crowd, IMHO :) Sorta reminds me a of "classical" New Kids On the Block :)
 
WHAT A BOGUS REVIEW!!! How in in the hell can anyone here take you serioulsy andrew with out a picture of the reviewed cigar with a quarter above it? :p LMAO


Ohhh chit!!! must of been my computer loading slow....I see it now. :sign: ROTFLMAO
 
TheBeast said:
WHAT A BOGUS REVIEW!!! How in in the hell can anyone here take you serioulsy andrew with out a picture of the reviewed cigar with a quarter above it? :p LMAO


Ohhh chit!!! must of been my computer loading slow....I see it now. :sign: ROTFLMAO
Jeff,

You need to upgrade that Commdore 64 ya got there

:sign:
 
TheBeast said:
WHAT A BOGUS REVIEW!!! How in in the hell can anyone here take you serioulsy andrew with out a picture of the reviewed cigar with a quarter above it? :p LMAO


Ohhh chit!!! must of been my computer loading slow....I see it now. :sign: ROTFLMAO
New nickname for ya... TheTool... ;)
 
I have a "tool" which thanks to your cigar reviews gave me the idea of posting of picture of it with a quarter above it at the "Adult Dating" sites I'm member at. The emails just keep COMING. :sign:
 
cvmfour said:
WOW :0 That cigar is almost dripping in oil. Thanks for sharing Moki :thumbs:
That's because he just pulled it out of...

Woah! Must...keep...internal...voice...internal.
 
Tony Bones said:
cvmfour said:
WOW :0 That cigar is almost dripping in oil. Thanks for sharing Moki :thumbs:
That's because he just pulled it out of...

Woah! Must...keep...internal...voice...internal.
Nope, you're right... tickled a bit, too...
 
I know this is an old review, but i was doing some research on the OR Anejo. I received one from my secret santa and I'm definitely looking forward to trying it out.

great review and info!
E
 
Why are you taunting me Erick...did you have to remind me. :angry:

Brian
 
Top