nfulton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2006
- Messages
- 1,515
Montecristo Edmundo
Cuban
Size: 5.3 x 52
2005
I am not going to do a formal review because I have only had two, but I did want to see what others were saying. If it is anything like my experience, I think it is time to pick up a box.
I smoked the first early Sunday afternoon and was absolutely floored by the complexity and flavor (not always present in the montes that I have had which I love but seem more one dimensional), especially in such a young cigar. Toasty, earthy, spicy...a bit like the no. 2 but with something else that I couldn't put my finger on. Something more. The spice was more pleasant and had more "nose' to it and was not peppery at all. It was well rolled, but not quite perfect, but had that perfect sponginess which gave it a great draw. It was so good, that after a few chores, I ran back out to the porch and fired up another. Same thing! Spot on to my tastes. A slow, slow burner and more than ample smoke. It began on the lower end of the medium/full side only gradually increased in strength.
Anyhow, any other reviewers care to give me an opinion.
Nate
edited to add date
Cuban
Size: 5.3 x 52
2005
I am not going to do a formal review because I have only had two, but I did want to see what others were saying. If it is anything like my experience, I think it is time to pick up a box.
I smoked the first early Sunday afternoon and was absolutely floored by the complexity and flavor (not always present in the montes that I have had which I love but seem more one dimensional), especially in such a young cigar. Toasty, earthy, spicy...a bit like the no. 2 but with something else that I couldn't put my finger on. Something more. The spice was more pleasant and had more "nose' to it and was not peppery at all. It was well rolled, but not quite perfect, but had that perfect sponginess which gave it a great draw. It was so good, that after a few chores, I ran back out to the porch and fired up another. Same thing! Spot on to my tastes. A slow, slow burner and more than ample smoke. It began on the lower end of the medium/full side only gradually increased in strength.
Anyhow, any other reviewers care to give me an opinion.
Nate
edited to add date