I am a bit bummed out that only 11 people read my review yesterday, and noone commented. I suppose I should just write the reviews for myself and not worry about the audience, however I did spend quite awhile writing it. Perhaps I offended people with my jokes Monday to the point they aren't reading my posts. I was in a bad mood today when I sat down to smoke this stogie, and I finished with a mood not noticably better; this cigar was at a disadvantage but here is my review:
Scores
Appearance - 70
Construction - 85
Burn - 56
Draw - 86
Flavor - 41
Value - 40
Overall - 52
Appearance of the wrapper's surface was nice with few visable veins and only one that was slightly raised. The cigar was finished with a shaggy foot which was a nice change; not necessarily better looking but a plus because its a break from the ordinary. The color of this wrapper seemed all around unnatural to me though. I my past experience rosado leaves are reddish brown where as this thing looked magenta The wrapper did have a nice oily sheen visable in the sun.
The cigar seemed well constructed, the surface was smooth and even and it didn't unravel at all upon cutting. Draw was a bit too easy but I prefer that to the opposite. The wrapper burned very unevenly throughout, however the binder and filler burned nice and even. The end result was that I had to nuke the wrapper with my torch a couple of times as it got annoyingly uneven. On the spots the cigar was burning properly the ash was a nice even light grey color.
The cigar yielded very nice quantities of thick, heavy smoke. Nice trails of this thick smoke kept rising from both ends of the cigar for a good five to ten seconds after each draw, this was the most enjoyable aspect of this cigar. The flavor was weak and mild to medium bodied. It tingled my tongue more than the roof of my mouth, this was out of the norm. The flavor contained some cedary notes and some grassy flavor. I can forgive a LOT of flaws if a cigar tastes good. This wasn't really bad but alltogether unnoticable - it tasted like smoke. Plenty of machine made cigars can best the flavor it presented - a cigar would have to taste notably bad to score worse in my book.
This cigar proves that a maker can do several things very well and still end up with a flop. I suspect there is a very nice blend of filler in inside the mutant wrapper, and it was cleary rolled by skilled rollers. The factor that is separating this bad cigar from being a better one sits solely on the wrapper. As a novice cigar smoker I suspect if they fermented the wrapper another time and aged it several more years they might have something. But since the wrapper of this cigar is its highlighed feature the cigar overall slips below mediocracy into the dog rocket zone. If I continue to have space to spare in my coolidor to hold onto the other 4 sizes I have from the sampler I might try one again in a year. Not recommended.
Matt
Scores
Appearance - 70
Construction - 85
Burn - 56
Draw - 86
Flavor - 41
Value - 40
Overall - 52
Appearance of the wrapper's surface was nice with few visable veins and only one that was slightly raised. The cigar was finished with a shaggy foot which was a nice change; not necessarily better looking but a plus because its a break from the ordinary. The color of this wrapper seemed all around unnatural to me though. I my past experience rosado leaves are reddish brown where as this thing looked magenta The wrapper did have a nice oily sheen visable in the sun.
The cigar seemed well constructed, the surface was smooth and even and it didn't unravel at all upon cutting. Draw was a bit too easy but I prefer that to the opposite. The wrapper burned very unevenly throughout, however the binder and filler burned nice and even. The end result was that I had to nuke the wrapper with my torch a couple of times as it got annoyingly uneven. On the spots the cigar was burning properly the ash was a nice even light grey color.
The cigar yielded very nice quantities of thick, heavy smoke. Nice trails of this thick smoke kept rising from both ends of the cigar for a good five to ten seconds after each draw, this was the most enjoyable aspect of this cigar. The flavor was weak and mild to medium bodied. It tingled my tongue more than the roof of my mouth, this was out of the norm. The flavor contained some cedary notes and some grassy flavor. I can forgive a LOT of flaws if a cigar tastes good. This wasn't really bad but alltogether unnoticable - it tasted like smoke. Plenty of machine made cigars can best the flavor it presented - a cigar would have to taste notably bad to score worse in my book.
This cigar proves that a maker can do several things very well and still end up with a flop. I suspect there is a very nice blend of filler in inside the mutant wrapper, and it was cleary rolled by skilled rollers. The factor that is separating this bad cigar from being a better one sits solely on the wrapper. As a novice cigar smoker I suspect if they fermented the wrapper another time and aged it several more years they might have something. But since the wrapper of this cigar is its highlighed feature the cigar overall slips below mediocracy into the dog rocket zone. If I continue to have space to spare in my coolidor to hold onto the other 4 sizes I have from the sampler I might try one again in a year. Not recommended.
Matt