CgarDan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 6,483
Was planning to post this with pics and took one of the cigar. Well I am sure you alkl have seen how it looks.
The cigar looks good, wrapper in particular. Mine was partially square pressed not sure if that is normal.
Anyway the experience as a whole was nothing special. A few spicy notes every once in a while but otherwise just plain tobacco with a few harsh notes on some pulls.
Construction was somewhat faulty as I did have to correct the burn once and had to relight a bit past the half way mark.
In conclusion: Not my type of a cigar. The vintage 99 was much better. Still have the Ditka XX so that review to follow later on
The cigar looks good, wrapper in particular. Mine was partially square pressed not sure if that is normal.
Anyway the experience as a whole was nothing special. A few spicy notes every once in a while but otherwise just plain tobacco with a few harsh notes on some pulls.
Construction was somewhat faulty as I did have to correct the burn once and had to relight a bit past the half way mark.
In conclusion: Not my type of a cigar. The vintage 99 was much better. Still have the Ditka XX so that review to follow later on