Cigar review guidelines?

[Fyodor]

What's the deal with the new rules about reviews? Taking it pretty serious huh? Seems a bit anal to me. I hope we won't be held to that system. You are stifling my creative energy! I can not create my own artistic vision under these conditions!

 

[Fyodor]

Well I see they have been changed a bit. Hey, I was just messing with you guys, you didn't have to change it on my account. LOL ???

 

[mrjinglesusa]

Hey, I was just messing with you guys, you didn't have to change it on my account. LOL ???

[snapback]224104[/snapback]​

I'm pretty sure they didn't. I think it's a good idea to have some "guidelines". Keeps things relatively consistent from reviewer to reviewer. And they are only guidelines after all - you don't HAVE to follow them.

 

[atuck]

Either way. I am still going to suck at giving reviews. :laugh:

 

[BrownDevil]

Either way. I am still going to suck at giving reviews. :laugh:

[snapback]224460[/snapback]​

Yeah, ditto with that.
My last review was more of a short story

But I'll try to adhere to the new format

 

[Rod]

Fyodor - It's called Guidelines, not Rules. And no, we didn't lighten them up for you.

The guidelines are here to help you give a good review. If your review is only a couple of sentences, big deal, get your point across and have fun. The only thing we ask you do is provide the full name of the cigar in the TOPIC. Of course, the more detail you can provide the better the review, however it's not essential.

Thanks,
Rod

 

[vewyphishy]

All my reviews will always be the same.

"It was a [good / bad] cigar."

That is all.