• Hi Guest - Sign up now for Secret Santa 2024!
    Click here to sign up!
  • Hi Guest - Come check out all of the new CP Merch Shop! Now you can support CigarPass buy purchasing hats, apparel, and more...
    Click here to visit! here...

Bolivar Belicosos Finos (ISOM) review

moki

el Presidente
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Messages
9,418
isom_bolivar_belicosos_fino.jpg


This Cuban Bolivar Belicosos Finos barely escaped being snipped and torched at the SuperBowl. It was to be my "overtime" smoke, but Vinatieri didn't want to cooperate with my evil plans, so I was forced to put it back into my humidor. I've been wanting to give this cigar a go for a while, because I like a fuller-bodied cigar, and I'm told these babies would be right up my alley.

The wrapper is a nice golden brown, but unfortunately it has started coming apart in places. I don't think this is a reflection on the construction of the cigar, but just rather that it's been through quite a bit of hand-changing. I lit it up, and was immediately greeted with nice spicy flavor that reminded me of an Opus X, but finished significantly different: it has more of a leathery/molasses finish that's quite nice.

Despite the wrapper issues, the cigar burned quite well, with the ash coming off only after I knocked it into the ashtray. The taste after a few draws in a row is quite nice, it has a "fuller" flavor than the Opus X, sort of like eating a meal with a jalapeno on it, rather than just eating a jalapeno by itself.

This is a really good cigar, but alas, I think it may be a little "young". It's from August 2003 so it's 6 months old or so, but in addition to all of the flavors I'm tasting, there is unfortunately some bitterness that is characteristic of cigars that aren't quite "ripe" for the smoking.

Overall, I think this could be a great, complex cigar, but it just isn't there yet -- it definitely needs some more aging time. It has some nice spiciness, a leathery snarl, and a bit of sweetness like caramelized sugar... and then the bitterness comes along and ruins it all, like someone peeing on your cornflakes.

In a few years, perhaps it will be a great smoke. Am I patient enough to go through the effort to obtain a box of these cigars, and then age them for a few years before I can smoke them? While the taste seems like it could be compelling, I'd have to say "no". Call me lazy, but I'd rather buy some easier to obtain, already aged and ready to smoke domestic cigars.

I do have a second one of this same cigar, however, and I will leave it buried in my humidor for a year or two, and revisit the cigar (and re-review it) then.
 
moki said:
isom_bolivar_belicosos_fino.jpg


This Cuban Bolivar Belicosos Finos barely escaped being snipped and torched at the SuperBowl. It was to be my "overtime" smoke, but Vinatieri didn't want to cooperate with my evil plans, so I was forced to put it back into my humidor. I've been wanting to give this cigar a go for a while, because I like a fuller-bodied cigar, and I'm told these babies would be right up my alley.

The wrapper is a nice golden brown, but unfortunately it has started coming apart in places. I don't think this is a reflection on the construction of the cigar, but just rather that it's been through quite a bit of hand-changing. I lit it up, and was immediately greeted with nice spicy flavor that reminded me of an Opus X, but finished significantly different: it has more of a leathery/molasses finish that's quite nice.

Despite the wrapper issues, the cigar burned quite well, with the ash coming off only after I knocked it into the ashtray. The taste after a few draws in a row is quite nice, it has a "fuller" flavor than the Opus X, sort of like eating a meal with a jalapeno on it, rather than just eating a jalapeno by itself.

This is a really good cigar, but alas, I think it may be a little "young". It's from August 2003 so it's 6 months old or so, but in addition to all of the flavors I'm tasting, there is unfortunately some bitterness that is characteristic of cigars that aren't quite "ripe" for the smoking.

Overall, I think this could be a great, complex cigar, but it just isn't there yet -- it definitely needs some more aging time. It has some nice spiciness, a leathery snarl, and a bit of sweetness like caramelized sugar... and then the bitterness comes along and ruins it all, like someone peeing on your cornflakes.

In a few years, perhaps it will be a great smoke. Am I patient enough to go through the effort to obtain a box of these cigars, and then age them for a few years before I can smoke them? While the taste seems like it could be compelling, I'd have to say "no". Call me lazy, but I'd rather buy some easier to obtain, already aged and ready to smoke domestic cigars.

I do have a second one of this same cigar, however, and I will leave it buried in my humidor for a year or two, and revisit the cigar (and re-review it) then.
Moki:

Ever consider picking up cigars that are already aged? Their availability and cost is significantly better than many of the rare or high-end domestics you've been buying. I've got no patience for aging either... but it hasn't stopped me from enjoying some of the best sticks out there. As far as calling you lazy... here goes, "Lazy!" :D :D

Cheers,

- Oak
 
oak said:
Ever consider picking up cigars that are already aged? Their availability and cost is significantly better than many of the rare or high-end domestics you've been buying. I've got no patience for aging either... but it hasn't stopped me from enjoying some of the best sticks out there. As far as calling you lazy... here goes, "Lazy!" :D :D
I'd love to. I've no idea where to find them, though.
 
Nice review. You'll find that a BBF with a couple years on it is a fantastic smoke.
 
lucasbuck said:
Nice review. You'll find that a BBF with a couple years on it is a fantastic smoke.
That I definitely believe.
 
At 6 months of age it could be in it's "sick" period, which would explain the bitterness. The blend on the BBF changed significantly after 1994 and again after 1996. They used to be real powerhouses that only the experienced smoker would tackle. The average smoker just wouldn't buy something that rocked their world the way a BBF would. So, the blend was changed to accomodate a larger audience. 1997-2001 BBFs were very mild, when compared to earlier issues. The newer ones seem to have come back to a fuller bodied blend, though I have yet to try an '03.
 
Top