Alright guys!
This is my first ever blind review! I have recently received a package from Ben =)
Please bear with my as my English grammar and syntax sucks LOL
The time of the review was around 10:00 right before a loooong day in a lab =(
I will be smoking this little cigar in back yard, it was cloudy and not hotter then 78F
Here I am laying around all my little preperation
And here is a taste of the surrounding
I first glance I am guessing that this is a Robusto 5 by 50. The wrapper was smooth and with virtually no veins, of a solid construction with a triple caped.
The wrapper gave out a hint of sweet leather tobacco smell, upon sniffing the foot I did not detect any major fragrance different from the wrapper.
Went ahead and cut this stogie with my crappy cutter (cannot wait to get the Palio from Rob)
Here is how I usually review my smokes, I try my best (sorry for my inexperienced taste buds) to describe inch by inch the development of the smoke, take notes and then I rewrite the whole thing in my "Big Book Of Smoke" (extra large Moleskine Journal)
Here goes The initial puff from the stick gave out a strong peppery puff (hurt my nostrils a little) almost the same as a Don Peppin or Tats would have. The draw was very easy, effortless.
Getting further in the first 1/5 the taste profile was of slightly woody taste topped with a peppery nose and followed by a faint spicy aftertaste. I noted that the wrapper was a bit dry upon my lips... But this stick was in my humi for about a week at 69% and 70F. At mid 1/5 the nose developed into a nice semi fruity sweet blended with cedar notes.
At 2/5 the cigar have "calmed" down a notch and I found that I really enjoy its nose more then the actual taste of the cigar ( I usually "back inhale" my smokes). On the other hand the taste was plain boring woody followed that same hint of spices.
I also found that this smoke was best enjoyed cold, if puffed on it too quickly the bitter peppery taste quickly arise and masks all other flavor, and it hurt to "back inhale" but, if let to cool a pleasant sweetness is more accentuated. Sadly the taste, even past the mid 2/5 mark did not taste like its nose...
The ash fell at the beginning of the 3/5, still no evolution in my experience, further down I was getting hints of nuts and some coffee not it never too off =(
I wasn't able to dissect the taste of it, more of a mild woody something, nothing spectacular. However, I really like the nose of this smoke.
At mid 3/5 the smoke "mellowed" out but still a pretty linear with no development smoke.
Here is a recap at the end of the 3/5:
Nose: Mix of a gentle woody sweet, somewhat complex
Taste: A plain woody, cedar flavor
Aftertaste: The woody give away to a faint nuts taste that last a little
One thing that I noticed is that this cigar gave out a generous amount of smoke, great since I enjoyed the "smoke" more then the taste of it... We are good
Even past the mid 4/5 mark this little guy disappointed me... there is nothing that stands out or special about it (IMHO), a uni dimensional smoke that took about 90 mins...
Not a bad smoke just mild, poor in taste and the only thing that saved it from been let to rest in peace early was its nicer nose.
It RIP at a pretty early stage... Certainly did not nub it =(
Verdict: Well I am pretty sure that I have never tried one of these before... I reminded me a not "ripe" Don Peppin, or a better version of a tat P2 or a bit like a Nub Habano, maybe a graycliff striped of its complexity and taste...
I don't know for sure...
I am going to go with a "bad" Grand Habano 3 siglos...
WRONG!
Actual band: Padilla Miami
EDIT: Added Pics